JK Rowling has challenged Scotland’s new hate crime law in a series of social media posts - inviting police to arrest her if they believe she has committed an offence.

The Harry Potter author, who lives in Edinburgh, described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

She said “freedom of speech and belief” was at an end if accurate description of biological sex was outlawed.

Earlier, Scotland’s first minister Humza Yousaf said the new law would deal with a “rising tide of hatred”.

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 creates a new crime of “stirring up hatred” relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.

Ms Rowling, who has long been a critic of some trans activism, posted on X on the day the new legislation came into force.

  • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I think the line is being drawn at “don’t sympathize with terrorist groups an opressive theocratic government” (publicly stating “at least the taliban know what a woman is”) and “don’t directly fund hate groups”.

    (Edited, see comment below)

      • seriousconsideration@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Using the Taliban as your source for moral authority is 100% aligning yourself with a terrorist group. Perhaps “sympathizing” isn’t the most accurate word, but are we here to be insufferable pedants or understand the issue?

        • mindbleach
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s not what “at least” means. It’s saying “even these assholes–”

            • mindbleach
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Neither of those is “using them as a source for moral authority” or “aligning herself with” that group.

              When I say “even Mitch McConnell knows The Idiot is responsible for January 6th,” I still fucking hate Mitch McConnell.

          • seriousconsideration@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Can you think of one valid reason why anyone would cite a terrorist organization as a moral authority in anything? Replace the word “Taliban” with “Nazis” and see how it sounds.

    • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Terrorist for ones are maybe freedom fighters for others - kind of sketchy line over there.