In an interview with NBC News, Hossein Amirabdollahian refused to acknowledge that Israel was behind the recent attack on his country.

Iran’s foreign minister on Friday refused to acknowledge that Israel was behind the recent attack on his country and described the weapons that were used as more like children’s toys.

“What happened last night was not a strike,” the foreign minister, Hossein Amirabdollahian, said in an interview with NBC News’ Tom Llamas. “They were more like toys that our children play with  not drones.”

Amirabdollahian, who spoke to NBC News in New York where he was attending a U.N. Security Council session, said Iran was not planning to respond unless Israel launches a significant attack.

“As long as there is no new adventurism by Israel against our interests, then we are not going to have any new reactions,” he said.

    • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Long before the nakba

      That wasn’t a reference to the Nakba, actually but to ethnic cleansing zionists were efforting toward prior even to The Balfour Declaration.

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The wiki article DarkGamer posted, in the comment you’re replying to, mentions Jewish land purchases predating the Balfour Declaration. I would recommend reading the article. It paints a more nuanced picture.

        (For the record, I think Israel’s current government is run by fascists and that what’s been happening in the West Bank and Gaza amounts to ethnic cleansing, although that doesn’t stop some people in the fediverse from insinuating I’m a zionist shill when I suggest Hamas or Iran aren’t the good guys either).

        • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          mentions Jewish land purchases predating the Balfour Declaration

          Yeah, so did the book I had originally linked. That was the topic, yes.

          Not addressed in DarkGamer’s retort is the policy of displacement those purchases were party to.