Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Wednesday night spoke on the floor of the U.S. Senate:

And let me also mention something that I found rather extraordinary and outrageous. And that is just a few days ago Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the leader of the right-wing extremist government in Israel, a government which contains out-and-out anti-Palestinian racists.

Netanyahu issued a statement in which he equated criticism of his government’s illegal and immoral war against the Palestinian people with antisemitism. In other words, if you are protesting, or disagree, with what Netanyahu and his extremist government are doing in Gaza, you are an antisemite.

That is an outrageous statement from a leader who is clearly trying – and I have to tell you, he seems to be succeeding with the American media — trying to deflect attention away from the horrific policies that he is pursuing that created an unprecedented humanitarian disaster.

So, let me be as clear as I can be: It is not antisemitic or pro-Hamas to point out that in almost seven months Netanyahu’s extremist government has killed 34,000 Palestinians and wounded more than 77,000 – seventy percent of whom are women and children.

It is not antisemitic to point out that Netanyahu’s government’s bombing has completely destroyed more than 221,000 housing units in Gaza, leaving more than one million people homeless – almost half the population. No, Mr. Netanyahu it is not antisemitic to point out what you have done in terms of the destruction of housing in Gaza.

It is not antisemitic to realize that his government has annihilated Gaza’s health care system, knocking 26 hospitals out of service and killing more than 400 health care workers. At a time when 77,000 people have been wounded and desperately need medical care, Netanyahu has systematically destroyed the health care system in Gaza.

It is not antisemitic to condemn his government’s destruction of all of Gaza’s 12 universities and 56 of its schools, with hundreds more damaged, leaving 625,000 children in Gaza have no opportunity for an education. It is not antisemitic to make that point.

It is not antisemitic to note that Netanyahu’s government has obliterated Gaza’s civilian infrastructure – there is virtually no electricity in Gaza right now, virtually no clean water in Gaza right now, and sewage is seeping out onto the streets.

It is not antisemitic to make that point.

President, it is not antisemitic to agree with virtually every humanitarian organization that functions in the Gaza area in saying that his government, in violation of American law, has unreasonably blocked humanitarian aid coming into Gaza.

  • thr0w4w4y2
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    actually it appears as though the House voted today to change the definition of anti-semitism to include criticism of the state of Israel, so in fact it now is anti-semitic to point out those things.

    source: https://lemm.ee/post/30979131

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      [The bill] requires the Department of Education to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of antisemitism when enforcing federal anti-discrimination laws

      This is what the bill actually does. I don’t like it, but there’s no reason to mischaracterize it

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Let’s check out this “working definition” shall we?: https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

        Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

        Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

        These can be stretched to call any criticism of israel “antisemitic”, especially given what israel is doing now.

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              No, but it is completely different from the mischaracterized representation of this bill as broadly covering all speech from the person I originally responded to, which was my entire point

              • ZombiFrancis
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                The DoE would be involved with the public university system where many protests are occurring. It is a law that is being made only to target these protestors expressing their speech. There’s been a slow steady march of these since 9/11.

      • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is getting really irritating today. This and the Boeing whistleblower death. People seem to think that just because they’re on the right side of an issue, they can just make shit up or not do their due diligence in looking into things. Thanks for correcting it.

        • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          And if you had done your due diligence by actually looking it up, you would see that it does exactly what they say, and has been heavily criticized for it since at least 2005.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            7 months ago

            This comment makes no sense. What is “it?” Who are “they?” What has been “heavily criticized,” and for what?

            • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m still pissed about you not getting an answer to this question. It’s upsetting that you can post nonsense that isn’t even related to the issue at hand, but that seems to be pointed in the right direction, and that’s enough for some people. I guess that’s a good sign of the times.

          • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m not sure what you’re talking about, but we’re talking about a bill that didn’t exist until only recently.

    • Papergeist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Its still not anti-semetic to criticize Netanyahu. Just because it’s a law, doesn’t make it right.

    • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      They’ve passed their bill… now let’s see them enforce it.

      Wouldn’t be surprised if they go all on on it. Its not just mask off these days… it’s underpants off as well.