Canada boasts the 9th largest economy, pristine environmental standards, a robust legal framework, universal healthcare, world class education, and numerous ...

Canada boasts the 9th largest economy, pristine environmental standards, a robust legal framework, universal healthcare, world class education, and numerous …

  • Kalcifer
    0•1 month ago

    Empty houses in the Metro Vancouver area have certinaly been an issue [source]. The B.C. Speculation and Vacancy Tax was implemented to discourage this behaviour [source]. Theoretically, it should also capture the negative impact that vacant housing has on society and the economy.

      • KalciferEnglish
        0•1 month ago

        I would guess that it is extremely difficult to quantify how much of an effect the tax has had on the housing market. Anything beyond a guess, however, would be outside of my qualifications — I would defer to those who have looked into this more appropriately. After a very quick, and cursory websearch, I found a paper that stated the following:

        From the empirical analysis of overall market, we cannot detect the significant effect of Speculation and Vacancy Tax on the price of housing property in Vancouver after the implementation. Only the parameters of GDP of real estate growth and unemployment rate are reexamined to be statistically significant. We could observe the decrease of housing price in Vancouver from the price chart after the tax policy entered into force. The decrease is also reflected by the negative coefficient of City*Time although it is not significant. […] Focusing on a specific region’s housing price, we still cannot detect that British Columbia’s Speculation and Vacancy Tax has significantly impact on the housing price of Vancouver West compared to Toronto Central. All the other factors mentioned by other researches are not statistically significant neither. [source (archive)]

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart
          0•1 month ago

          So what were we talking about before you started trying to derail this conversation with endless questions?

          • KalciferEnglish
            1•1 month ago

            So what were we talking about before you started trying to derail this conversation with endless questions?

            Is that rhetorical? I don’t understand the purpose of your seemingly condescending question.

              • KalciferEnglish
                1•1 month ago

                Why do you constantly ask questions without adding anything to the conversation?

                That’s a loaded question; I disagree with the premise — I feel that I have provided useful information and context. You, however, have not provided anything but seemingly non-constructive and condescending content for your past 3 comments [1][2][3] in this thread.

                • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                  1•1 month ago

                  What premise do you disagree with?

                  None of these replies are meant to be condescending, you’re correct when you say tone is hard to read through text.

                  • Kalcifer
                    1•1 month ago

                    What premise do you disagree with?

                    The premise that I haven’t provided anything useful to the conversation.

                    None of these replies are meant to be condescending, you’re correct when you say tone is hard to read through text.

                    If that is the case, then I would advise you to put more care into how you word your replies. Be mindful of the effects of accusations.