I learned a lot about donestication from this video. I knew domestication was basically eugenic, but I didn’t realize it could happen in so few generations.

  • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    TIL: the domesticated ones seemingly lean toward either a canine or feline demeanor, and take on physical characteristics of the same, depending on which they lean to, while becoming less like a fox in looks and behavior.

    • VarykOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      This smacks suspiciously of projection, because all the videos (The countless I have now watched haha) state how different foxes are from dogs and cats, and specifically the owners of five of these domesticated foxes say "they aren’t at all I’mlike a dog or a cat, because it’s a different animal. It would be like owning a horse and comparing it to a dog or a cat’

      • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        How ironic that you passively accuse me of “projection” and then claim to quote “five” “owners” without citing your reference. Curious. 😶

        • VarykOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Amazing.

          1. Not talking about you, unless your TIL “fact” is some snippet you’ve made up yourself.

          2. I don’t quote “‘five’ owners”, I quote the two owners of five of these foxes saying that a fox does not act like a dog or a cat in the same way a horse doesn’t act like a dog or a cat. Are you drunk?

          3. Your confusion is not curious. You misread and misinterpreted the comments without even watching the video referenced in the OP.

          • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Hunh. Somehow even more telling. That tracks.

            1. You didn’t specify and continue with passive insinuation. Cute.

            2. Edited now, and yet even the corrected version doesn’t change the lack of citation.

            3. Ah, there’s the direct tantrum. Mid. What a joke.

            Bye, Felicia.

            • VarykOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I specifically cited the reference and your errors.

              You’re clearly just having trouble with words: you’ve ignored or definitely misunderstood all the comments and incorrectly used the words “specify”, “passive”, “insinuation”, “lack” “citation” and “tantrum”.

              You also had that earlier trouble with “five”.

              Tip: not a great idea to sign your name on social media