@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 19 days agoApple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'www.engadget.comexternal-linkmessage-square80fedilinkarrow-up1283arrow-down116
arrow-up1267arrow-down1external-linkApple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'www.engadget.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 19 days agomessage-square80fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-12•19 days agoWe’ll see how it pans out. As of now I don’t know of any phone manufacturer doing on-device AI… so??? Is that innovation?
minus-squareParadoxlinkfedilinkEnglish21•19 days agoGoogle has been doing on device stuff since at least the pixel 3
minus-square@sugar_in_your_tealinkEnglish15•19 days agoGoogle does on the Pixel line, at least for pictures (and probably more).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•19 days agoI mean the biggest innovation here isn’t the “AI” (partially “on-device” or otherwise). It’s exposing the apps action hooks to the model.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•19 days agoOk, so either way, there’s innovation no? I get the “Apple bad” thing but come on, they actually ARE doing something here
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•18 days agoI dunno if ‘Siri but functional’ is good enough to get points from me. That said this is definitely good for the industry
We’ll see how it pans out. As of now I don’t know of any phone manufacturer doing on-device AI… so??? Is that innovation?
Google has been doing on device stuff since at least the pixel 3
Google does on the Pixel line, at least for pictures (and probably more).
I mean the biggest innovation here isn’t the “AI” (partially “on-device” or otherwise). It’s exposing the apps action hooks to the model.
Ok, so either way, there’s innovation no?
I get the “Apple bad” thing but come on, they actually ARE doing something here
I dunno if ‘Siri but functional’ is good enough to get points from me. That said this is definitely good for the industry