• MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    It will depend on how much investment they put into the development and research they do with AI. Because this is a race and for now nobody wants to step on the brakes until there is another winter for AI.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I think it will be missing whatever you want to call the human spirit for a long time. It’s missing in writing and it’s missing in pictures. The technical ability is advancing at an impressive pace, but at the end of the day I find things generated by AI to just feel empty and dull.

      I still use them and enjoy them and want to see how far they can go, but I think there is an upper bound that is below human journeyman level until we create a vastly different sort of AI that might surpass sentience and perhaps even be considered sapient. And we’re currently far short of sentient.

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Pictures have an easy fix because text is the worst possible input. It’s a demo gone feral. Image-to-image can fill content and apply style over anything, which is how you get those detailed medieval landscapes where you squint and it’s Rick Astley.

        The near-future use of this tech is rendering blocky CGI (or even just finger-painting keyframes) and having the machine tweak that to hell and back.