• MintyFresh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    It makes you wonder about the Carthagenians and Druids. Both religions the Romans persecuted heavily. Makes you wonder if the accusations of child sacrifice and ritualistic cannablisim was ancient propaganda or if there was some truth in it. Cause they were pretty tolerant* to just about everyone else.

    *Tolerant by ancient conquering slave owning rampaging army standards.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I might be able to offer some insight here - Carthage, as a state, was unduly burdened and then eradicated in a, quite frankly, shameful manner, but Carthaginians were ethnic Punics. Rome, after Carthage itself was destroyed, allowed the Punics of North Africa to continue practicing their culture, religion, and language without interference. Hell, in the future, Emperor Septimius Severus was part Punic, even, and spoke Latin with a Punic accent! So it’s really just a matter of the Roman Republic holding an irrational grudge against a single city.

      As for the druids, they were wiped out, specifically, because Rome was trying to keep the Gauls and Britons from revolting as much as they could. Druids were a priestly caste, but also a caste of leaders that people could rally around. Other Gallic and Briton religious practices survived unmolested.

      Both were also accused of human sacrifice by the Romans (who considered such practices both immoral and an offense to the gods), and whether that was true is a whole can of worms waiting to be opened. “Not today, Satan” I say!

      • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not today! Ha. Excellent write up, ty. That does seem awfully plausible and pragmatic in an awful sort of way.