• burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    What in the… This seems 10+ years too early, like the early asteroid mining companies that folded. OISLs are still far from a solved problem (except for SpaceX), and this is a another level beyond that.

    • Morphit @feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Some of the applications sound really interesting and given that clients need no special hardware means currently on orbit satellites could benefit from this. Keeping lunar payloads alive through the night would be awesome - way simpler than getting nuclear power deployed there.

      Yeah, I think the power transmitter and the targeting need a lot of work, but I think there are customers that would pay ridiculous rates to reduce orbit raising times or do more taskings per orbit than their power budget would normally allow.

      • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’d prefer to be wrong, because it just sounds cool, but this feels like the same conversation as refueling. With mass to orbit and component manufacturing getting cheaper and more available, it seems easier to have bigger solar arrays and more batteries. I’m sure there’ll be some GEO birds that want a light in the darkness, but, like refueling and mission extension so far, that’s not a big market.

        I’m just skeptical of startups that feel more built to extract venture capital than turn a profit.