• Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    yup, even youtube isn’t profitable. Video remains one of the largest sinks of resources. A 4K movie is stored on a disc of about 66GB, so about 30GB per hour of 4k video. Even with peertube it’d take the best hobbyists to run even a modest server for a few streamers. We’re talking people with PB level of storage capacities now with fiber lines to their house to truly host peertube alternatives, and if we’re talking cloud we’re talking thousands per month.

    It’s not impossible, I don’t want to get people down, but that’s the major hurdle

    • AK1@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every video maker should host his own peertube instance with only 1 user.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        yeah but then we get a youtube esque site of nerds who love hoarding hard drives and setting up selfhosted services. Which is great, I did that, but the vast majority of youtubers don’t have the knowledge/don’t want to set that up

    • Xuerian@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which makes me wonder - was the push for 60fps across the platform a move to make competition harder?

      I’m not aware of anyone that was using it as a leg up on them.