Plays stupid games, win stupid prizes as the saying goes.

    • Varyk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just because you can’t read or interpret most of the articles or dara you spew out doesn’t mean the rest of us are similarly challenged.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I think you’ve given us plenty of proof of just how challenged you are. Your lack of self awareness is just a cherry on top. You’re like the embodiment of the Dunning-Kruger syndrome.

        • Varyk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, of course you think that. From the false data you constantly propagandize, you demonstrably believe that no means yes and 1 = 4

          Telling that Dunning-Kruger is the first technical term you bring up that you might actually know the definition of.

            • Varyk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Any data that is not independently verified (ie, your hopeful propaganda), I don’t like.

              Unlike you, I don’t chill for a single entity, I simply like people to be properly and fairly informed.

              You can refer back to the article that has actual data from multiple countries that count the number of false data used in Chinese scientific articles. If you’re confused about actual data versus wishful thinking.

                • Varyk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ah yes, purporting an argument for another since you can’t counter their actual point.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There is no actual point to counter. You’re evidently claiming that CSIS data is not reliable and called it Chinese propaganda. I can’t believe you provide this level of entertainment at no charge.