A steel plant at the edge of this riverside town played a pivotal role in the family history of Sen. JD Vance.

The plant, Vance wrote in his memoir “Hillbilly Elegy,” was nothing less than an “economic savior” for his grandparents. A steady job there for his “Papaw” is what lifted his grandparents “from the hills of Kentucky into America’s middle class.”

Its future looks bright too, thanks in part to a grant of up to $500 million from the Biden administration. The money is aimed at helping its owners replace a coal-fired blast furnace so that steel can be produced with clean hydrogen and natural gas — improvements that would cut climate and air pollution and help ensure the plant stays open for another generation.

But the political benefits for the Biden administration — and by extension Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee — are less clear. This is true not just in Middletown but in similar communities across the country that are on track to receive funding from either the Inflation Reduction Act or the bipartisan infrastructure law, arguably the two biggest domestic accomplishments of President Joe Biden’s time in the White House.

Both measures remain largely unknown to the public, polling has shown. Perhaps as worrisome for Harris is that the federal investments may not do much to break the country’s partisan divide, even in places that have benefited from the spending.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    3 months ago

    “I don’t really look for the government to do anything for you,” he said. “It’s more like just stay out of my way.”

    Same people are probably 100% fine with the government not allowing women access to modern birth control and reproductive care choices.

    They have this fantasy where they imagine “no government” would be awesome. Meanwhile, there’s plenty of shithole countries without a functioning government. They could move to one of those if they are serious and want to try that kind of life.

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They have this fantasy where they imagine “no government” would be awesome.

      “Woo! I can do what I want!” When many people want to make their immediate environment worse for everybody, even themselves, to the point that they make each other miserable. We can prove this by putting right-wing libertarians on the moon together. Some would be begging to come back within a week.

      https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/21534416/free-state-project-new-hampshire-libertarians-matthew-hongoltz-hetling

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        It is pretty funny that many small/no government movements end up creating governments because of fucking course they do. No laws sounds great until other people start doing shit you don’t like. Also funny is how many freedom loving Republicans live in HOAs. They love rugged individualism as long as it looks exactly like theirs.

        • wjrii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          They love rugged individualism as long as it looks exactly like theirs.

          Yup, they also will hear zero talk of actually setting everyone back on an even footing. Ask them about re-pooling all resources and opportunities and letting people start from scratch and compete solely by their own sweat and innovation.

          Nosiree, none of that is necessary because they already pulled themselves up by their bootstraps right through (well funded public) school and then went to college (paid for by the money their parents earned at the jobs with the racist bosses who never would have hired non-whites). Well, unless things were tough for them at home of course, in which case they had to get (government subsidized) loans and maybe even take out a second mortgage on the house (that they inherited from gramps in the redlined neighborhood). But you know what? They worked hard at that job with the defense contractor (that was lobbying for inefficient government contracts in their local congressional district). They spent so much time commuting on (subsidized) highways burning (subsidized) gas. How dare people ask for a functioning transit system; that costs MY money!

          Nope, nothing but pure self-starters who never got a single leg up due to government programs or structural advantages! Time for everybody to compete in a perfect marketplace starting…right… NOW! Go! Why are the rest of you so far behind? You must be those jealous, lazy mediocrities Ayn Rand told me about!

          Shit, I’m not even particularly opposed to playing the game. I don’t find anything deeply disturbing about wanting some safety and luxury and extra opportunities for the particular children you love the most. Just don’t be a dick thinking you mastered the game through sheer will, or be unwilling to pass some reasonable share of the resulting GDP back to people who need it more than you, and on whom you depend to be your community. Our culture frankly asks for ridiculously little from those whom the system serves, and having the gall to think that it’s rigged against you and that you’re morally entitled to every single economic unit vaguely related to your mere existence strikes me as the height of arrogance.

          • SeaJ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Half of your post reminds of Craig T Nelson talking about the time he was poor and on food stamps and nobody came and helped him out. So clearly people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps like he did.

            Or Boebert complaining about socialism while in the same sentence talking about how she grew up on government cheese and welfare. So much cognitive dissonance.