• katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    the uses of ai that firefox has implemented are optional and great for accessibility. why would you oppose that?

    • MeaTLoTioN@mas.erb.pwOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      @cupcakezealot I would oppose that because I don’t want ai infecting my computers or life. Having an “opt-out” simply isn’t good enough either. IF they deem it necessary to bow down and be submissive to AI, the must make it opt-in and not infect the browser but make it an addon (read extension).

      Anything else would undermine both their browser, and their relationship with their browser users.

      If you want to use AI, use it, but don’t make it the default and/or force people to use it, simples