• RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    pretty much everyone in the hemisphere “nearly” lost WW2

    I reread my comment and it was ambiguous. I meant nearly lost the war in the beginning due to lack of leadership which they basically executed early in the revolution.

    You’re right, nearly all of Europe lost in that war. The only two winners were USA and USSR

    • agamemnonymous
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      nearly lost the war in the beginning due to lack of leadership which they basically executed early in the revolution.

      The only two winners were USA and USSR

      A puzzling juxtaposition, that.

        • agamemnonymous
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          History is rife with "nearly"s. The USSR had to content with y’know, actually being in the middle of both world wars and suffering the material consequences. And then went on to go toe-to-toe with the golden child of capitalism (safely nestled on its distant continent, far from the material consequences of war, with all the post-war industrial economic advantages that wrought).

          The US had a freakish advantage, no one should have gotten even close. And the USSR got smacked down bad through both wars. And yet, they were stiff competition. It’s like gloating that your thoroughbred greyhound barely beat out a half-blind, 3-legged street dog in a race. The fact that it was close should be your sign.

          • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s a very narrow view of what happened after the second world war. URSS occupied half of the European continent. It basically was the last empire in Europe with all the resources and human capital at its disposal to do anything it wanted. Not to mention war reparations.

            And it lost. The ideology wasn’t working. It took 40 years for that empire to collapse, but collapse it did because it was built on the wrong principles.

            • agamemnonymous
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m sure famine, sanctions, and concentrated international sabotage had nothing to do with it.

                • agamemnonymous
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Last I checked, 1946-1947 comes after 1945, double-check my math though.

                  And let’s circle back around to the far more important concentrated international sabotage if you please.

                  • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The Soviet Union collapsed in 1990 because of the famine in 47?

                    And let’s circle back around to the far more important concentrated international sabotage if you please.

                    International sabotage? Do you have evidence of sanctions against USSR and their allies which weren’t matched back by USSR & their allies?