• this
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It’s not a double standard though. Killing one person who was objectively profiting off of the lives and suffering of millions of people is very different than killing/imprisoning anyone who disagrees with you.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago
      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        He still banned being gay. He signed a law that made homosexuality punishable by five years imprisonment. Stalin is cancelled for being homophobic.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            No, not literally everyone. 10% of the population was gay back then, same as now. The institute of sexology in Germany was performing bottom surgery for trans women.

            Homophobes want you to think gay acceptance is new, but it’s not. There have always been people who could tell right from wrong. Stalin wasn’t one of them.

        • theonlytruescotsman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah Stalin still had issues and it was awful that the working theory at the time was homosexuality was a result of western decadence since literally all the rich people they found were doing weird sex stuff and Germany and the US killed all the gay communists and socialists they could and burned their books so there was no real example they could find of any ‘deviance’ being innate.

          That all being said towards the end the crack down wire off and five years labor is still better than what any other country at the time did to cure the gays.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            He signed the law when it arrived on his desk. If he had been an ally, he wouldn’t have signed it. Drag can’t imagine Joe Biden signing a law like that, even if the house and senate approved it. Joe Stalin is held to the same standard by history.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              32 minutes ago

              If he had been an ally, he wouldn’t have signed it.

              can’t imagine Joe Biden signing a law like that

              Bringing up 2024’s Biden is a non sequitur. We already went over this: no mid-20th century Western state was a gay ally.

      • this
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Hold up a minute, you are putting words in my mouth. I’m not even making any claims in my comment about how many Stalin killed or that he acted alone. Only the historically accurate fact that he is responsible for a significant amount of death and suffering, and that statistically it is impossible that everyone persecuted by the (Stalin lead) soviet government was innocent. You can argue numbers and western perception all you want but it is a historical fact that Stalin had the blood of innocent people on his hands, as many world leaders throughout history have had (including most if not all us presidents). Even if your claims are true it still doesn’t invalidate my point.