The vehicle is a key part of the justice’s just-folks persona. It’s also a luxury motor coach that was funded by someone else’s money.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/zQdpf

  • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Republicans see no problem with these massive gifts and Jared getting $2 Billion, but if Hunter Biden made a dollar they’re all over it.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        If your mom goes to the restaurant that you work at and you charge her a medium for large fries. That is the level of corruption I am ok with. You are allowed to super size the person who brought you into existence fries for free.

        Now let me know if you have any more difficult questions I can sort out for you.

          • Croquette
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 year ago

            At one point, republicans need to show proof or shut the fuck up. They’ve been talking about the stupid laptop for years to eventually admit they have dogshit. They claim to have dirt on Hunter Biden but never back it up.

            It is clearly a diversion tactic as usual.

            If they do have dirt on him, throw the book at Hunter/Joe Biden. Until then, shut the fuck up.

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not whataboutism. Corruption is bad. It’s asking for consistency.

                • aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Whataboutism implies that you are using that actions of person A to justify person B. It is not when you point out condemnation of person B for the same actions as person A but person A is not condemned.

      • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think that’s the point they’re trying to make. A corrupt bastard is a corrupt bastard, there is no immunity.