• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s a gift link. Unless you’ve disabled all cookies or something, you won’t hit a paywall. You will need to dismiss a pop-up about a change to their terms and (optionally) collapse a notification that it’s a gift link at the bottom of the screen.

    I will not post the full content of articles as it tends to attract copyright lawyers.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I did not know that. So we shouldn’t use archive links? Geez, who knew the end of the world would be paywalled.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Archive links are fine with a handful of exceptions (The San Francisco Chronicle sends lawyers after people who post links to archived copies of their articles)

        Just don’t post the actual content itself. And I don’t post archive links when I have a gift link.

        • inspxtr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh I didn’t know of those exceptions. Do you know of any others so I, among others, need to keep in mind when we post/use bots for archive links?

          What do/can journals like SF Chronicle do to people anyway, especially on sites like Lemmy or Reddit where users are technically semi-anonymous?

          • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            They can ask the folks hosting you for your address and then ask your ISP for your info.

            They can get the instance you used to take content down and push to get the instance taken down.

            The SF chronicle is the one I’ve run into, but there are likely others