• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol “no good reason” does not apply to the decisions the Lemmy.world admins have made for which instances to defederate from or what content to allow. They have been very straight forward with those decisions and explaining why.

    Not liking their decision doesn’t mean there is “no good reason”.

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Explaining the reason for making a decision doesn’t mean it’s an actual good reason btw.

      • gears
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you think they had good reasons? If not, care to explain why?

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, I don’t. They chose to preemptively defederate from an instance because some people might maybe not actually break their rules but just talk about their ideologies that the precious admin didn’t agree with.

          Why not just handle rule breakers if and when they break rules? Why ban an entire instance because you disagree with some of their ideologies?

          Can you explain why you agree with their stance, if you do?