• ______@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not NT so I like having the freedom and time to cook up good responses to texts that I can’t make on the spot in a call.

    (Btw not saying that NT people can do that easily but they seem to always be able to think quick on their feet socially speaking)

      • ______@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Im just gonna copy paste because I don’t think I can summarize it better:

        The word “neurotypical” is an informal term used to describe a person whose brain functions are considered usual or expected by society. This term is often applied to people who do not have a developmental disorder like autism, differentiating them from those who do. It is neither a mental disorder nor even an official diagnostic term.

    • AlDente
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “I’m not NT”

      Not with that attitude! For real though, nothing in this existence is black and white. Labels are for cans, not people.

      • ______@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I chose the word NT because I think it’s the least divisible label.

        I don’t choose or want to be neurodivergent, I’m reminded by NTs that I’m not normal in everyday life through social games and hints that I don’t understand.

        • AlDente
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I wouldn’t want to be called NT or non-NT. I definitely wouldn’t want someone applying an opposing label to me just because they perceive I’m different than a label they identify with. Everyone is unique in their own way. You can just call me human.

          I wish you the best, friend.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Correct, DSM has pushed this notion that correlation and diagnosis of symptoms are well understood when under the DSM they are more loose associations of symptoms that say nothing of cause. You wouldn’t group and heart attack and a broken rib as the same illness just because they both have the same symptom of chest pain. This isn’t to deny the real symptoms people have though.

        • AlDente
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know about this DSM, I just don’t like labels. Especially “normal”, that one sounds really lame.