The homeowner who fatally shot a 20-year-old University of South Carolina student who tried to enter the wrong home on the street he lived on Saturday morning will not face charges because the incident was deemed “a justifiable homicide” under state law, Columbia police announced Wednesday.

Police said the identity of the homeowner who fired the gunshot that killed Nicholas Donofrio shortly before 2 a.m. Saturday will not be released because the police department and the Fifth Circuit Solicitor’s Office determined his actions were justified under the state’s controversial “castle doctrine” law, which holds that people can act in self-defense towards “intruders and attackers without fear of prosecution or civil action for acting in defense of themselves and others.”

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’ll only ever hear one side of this story because the other witness is dead.

    • Objects in Space@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, they have physical evidence, audio evidence which probably means camera or video doorbell and the kid died on the front porch of someone else’s house. Seems like the story told itself. The simple explanation is he tried breaking into the wrong house thinking it was his own.

      Not saying he deserved to die over his mistake, it’s tragic and sad that the situation occurred.

      Editing to add this from the article:

      “evidence gathered at the scene, review of surveillance video that captures moments before the shooting, audio evidence, and witness statements.”

    • krayj
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      What would the other side of the story be? That he was breaking into his own house, but that the gun was fired from someone that had already broken into his own house and was wrongfully residing there? The facts are pretty basic here.

      • PopularUsername@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are reading as though it is undisputed facts. One reason it is undisputed is because the victim is dead. For one it would be nice to see how likely it was he actually broke glass or reached inside. Was it clear video from a camera at the door? Or some grainy footage from a neighbor across the street? It doesn’t say.