Vuraniute@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前fixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubimagemessage-square804fedilinkarrow-up1969arrow-down1146
arrow-up1823arrow-down1imagefixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubVuraniute@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前message-square804fedilink
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down2·1 年前This is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
minus-squareJohnDClaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Look up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 年前Why do you get to define axioms to exclude my definition?
minus-squareJohnDClaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前I don’t define axioms. It is the general definition commonly used, as recorded (but not decided) by the dictionary. Do you in fact have a different definition?
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 年前Words have the meaning we give them, not always just the original meaning
minus-squareJohnDClaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前Exactly. And the general meaning is the one I just gave.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-21 年前But general definition is not stable it changes. You’re just saying this in a way to negate my definition. Why do you get to define it?
minus-squareJohnDClaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前The majority/community defines it has hasn’t changed it yet.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·1 年前So you’re trying to say words have actual meanings?
This is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
Look up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.
Why do you get to define axioms to exclude my definition?
I don’t define axioms. It is the general definition commonly used, as recorded (but not decided) by the dictionary. Do you in fact have a different definition?
Words have the meaning we give them, not always just the original meaning
Exactly. And the general meaning is the one I just gave.
But general definition is not stable it changes. You’re just saying this in a way to negate my definition. Why do you get to define it?
The majority/community defines it has hasn’t changed it yet.
So you’re trying to say words have actual meanings?