Taken from the CompTIA IT Fundamentals Exam Guide book (2nd edition, published 2021). I’m not sure if they fixed this in newer versions, if at all.

    • PLAVAT🧿S
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not disagreeing about it being a scam but the government uses Sec+ as an IAT level 2 requirement. Helps meet some contract requirements.

      • Ocelot@lemmies.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        have you… seen the state of IT and technology in general in the government? I mean actually that explains a lot.

        • PLAVAT🧿S
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m just saying that government contracts == money and so my point is that while Comptia may be (read: most definitely is) a scam/racket it can make a person eligible for a paycheck. Agreed that it doesn’t mean they’re competent.

    • Ocelot@lemmies.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      not entirely. It makes it easy to filter out the kind of applicants that would put that on their resume. Very useful for hiring managers. Saves lots of time.