• PsychedSy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re assuming he existed and was necessary for the cult to start. Paul may be a better target.

    • SolarNialamide@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t have to assume Jesus existed, you just have to accept the historical evidence which there is plenty of

      • PsychedSy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am fine accepting historical consensus on the subject, but I personally have some issues with that particular specialty and their allegiances.

        I’d argue assume is apt as there’s no proof, but there’s sufficient evidence to support acceptance.