• highduc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I saw the news that Microsoft is eying to buy them. That’d be a tragedy and we’d say goodbye to such contributions.

    • dlove67@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Microsoft’s valuation is woefully underestimated

      Also GabeN would have to agree to sell it, it’s not really up to anyone else (and I don’t think he’s really interested)

      • highduc@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m worried that Gaben isn’t immortal and he’ll eventually die/retire/sell etc, and the people in his footsteps won’t share his vision. Throughout history this has been an often repeated story.

        • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is Gabe really that irreplaceable? The way he runs the company (flat-hierarchy), it’s mostly self-governing – the truly defining characteristic of his leadership is his willingness to be as hands-off as possible. A like-minded successor or even governing council could probably quite effectively handle things in Gabe’s absence.

          Well… regardless of that: nothing lasts forever, but that’s no reason to assume that things will change for the worse. Gabe seems to put a lot of deliberate thought into his actions, so I wouldn’t be surprised at all if he has already taken care of preparing for a smooth and faithful transition away from his leadership when the time comes. Who knows, maybe they’ll even do a better job than Gabe could?

          • merc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            The way he runs the company (flat-hierarchy), it’s mostly self-governing

            Is it really? Or is it a dictatorship under Gabe, but he’s a benevolent dictator who very rarely uses his dictatorial powers? Are there any influential people at Valve who don’t share his vision? Or is he using his power to softly, maybe even unconsciously, ensure that everyone influential sees eye-to-eye with him?

            Don’t get me wrong, that’s a good thing. I like Valve and I like its leadership. But, I don’t think there’s any chance it would survive his death or his stepping down.

            • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              To be clear, by using the term “flat-hierarchy” I was indeed suggesting a situation that’s exactly as you say: a company ruled under an iron first used sparingly – ergo “the truly defining characteristic of his leadership is his willingness to be as hands-off as possible.”

              We can of course only speculate as to the soft power dynamics at play, although we can be certain that a soft-power dynamic does exist. I even agree with you when you state that this dynamic is unique to Gabe’s specific personality and individual mannerisms and not something which can exist without him. Where we seem to differ, however, is in our opinion of how important Gabe’s special flavor of soft power really is – is it the secret sauce or nothing special?

              I argue that it’s nothing special. Given the right hand-picked successor, I foresee an uneventful transition and not a catastrophy. Some things will get easier and some things will get harder, but I think the overall structure and mission of the company will ensure a certain measure of continuity. If anything, I’m actually optimistic; the mere presence of a new leader will help change internal perceptions of what’s possible and help bring about some exciting new ideas.

              • merc
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I argue that it’s nothing special.

                I disagree given that as far as I know, Valve is the only company in the world that operates this way. I’ve worked plenty of places where the leadership talked about not having a hierarchy, but none of them could actually pull it off. When push came to shove, there were always bosses and those bosses had bosses, and decisions flowed down from the top. There are probably small communes where they’re able to make decisions using consensus, but Valve is a 1000 person company that’s a key player in a major industry.

          • Ilflish@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think on top of this, it’s probably safe to say there is already a plan set up to pass to someone Gabe trusts considering the hierarchy

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is my fear too. No doubt there are great people working at Valve, but Gabe is responsible for how customer first the company is. I too worry that Valve will fall when he’s gone.

    • galmuth@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      Valve are a private company, so Microsoft can’t just barge in and buy it up.

      Considering the investment Valve has poured into Linux because Gabe doesn’t trust Microsoft enough to have his business rely on Windows, I’d be pretty shocked if he decided to sell up to Microsoft.

      • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Valve is my favorite company. Not just because I like video games, but I love the way Gabe runs it. Valve is so customer focused and deserves the “don’t be evil” slogan. I am very scared of the day we lose Gabe because it’s his vision that drives them. Selling to Microsoft would destroy everything that makes them good.