California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like you’re the only one to talk about what might overlap. Are the guns to keep your feelings safe?

      • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t own any guns.

        Well, I do, but one is my grandfather’s hunting rifle and one is a shotgun for pest control/clay pigeon shooting, and both are stored at my mom’s farm.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh well fire up the 3D printer because apparently guns are fucking awesome and everyone needs them, with absolutely no oversight or accountability.

          That’s the usual level of pro-gun honesty though. “I don’t own any guns except for the 2 guns I own”.

          • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nice strawman there, buddy.

            And while I own two guns, I don’t possess them or rely on them for protection. That’s an important distinction to make.