• Navy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or, if we’re changing cities already we could make more accessible homes and public transit. If someone in a wheelchair can’t get onto a train you’ve made the train wrong.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I traveled up and down the East Coast with my dad when he was in a wheelchair. Every city was a little different but Amtrak has made their trains this way. A special ramp is needed, which has to be fetched by someone. Baltimore was the worst about it, but they did get us on just fine, and kicked a guy out of the handicapped starting. New York City was incredible. Dude hung out with us until our train showed up and made sure we got on and situated before regular boarding started. Though I think he had dealt with something similar personal and took it upon himself. DC was at about the level you’d expect and was pretty pleasant.

          • Navy@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Great to hear, that is actually a lot better than I would have expected. It would still be ideal if you could use it as easily as someone not using a wheelchair but we do have to live in the real world and accommodating everyone is complicated and expensive.

        • Ookami38
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Man. There’s a Korean drama on Netflix… I think it was All of Us Are Dead. The apartment building had a bodega-like grocery either on the first floor or connected to it. If we’re going to redesign, can it be like that, maybe?

          • Navy@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolutely it could be like that, mixed use buildings are something we really lack in North America and are the lifeblood of a city

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And that really worries me. The government should offer free options for people like that. Uber Eats and Instacart exploits the hell out of people like that.

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          And that’s something we can look into, but it’s no reason to stop walkable towns.

          • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            No one said it was.

            See, I knew one of you motherfuckers was going to come in here and make it obvious you just don’t care about the actual facts, you’ve already made up your minds and seek to make up everyone else’s minds for them.

            Maybe instead of treating every single discussion of anything like an epic shitfight, you all should just pool your money together, buy your own land, incorporate it as a separate county, and build your own walkable cities and leave the rest of us the fuck alone.

              • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Because you all are doing nothing but demonstrating for us once again the negativity and childish banality of the human condition, and I’m tired of it.

                The immaturity, the short-sightedness, the complete lack of empathy or consideration for anyone who disagrees with you – you all are attacking people, not just me, who are calling out walkable cities for being unviable for disabled people. One stupid motherfucker here even suggested people like that use delivery services to get their groceries instead of being able to drive, knowing Instacart and Uber Eats exploits the disabled and isn’t available everywhere. No consideration that it’s unfair for disabled people who can’t walk far regardless. No consideration that what you want isn’t completely viable because different people with different needs exist, nothing.

                Y’all are just angry other people are opposing you because you think us chucklefucks online disagreeing with you is a barrier to what you want and I’m tired of putting up with it.

                So until you change, I’m going to be angry at you, and if you don’t like me being angry at you for your own behavior, that’s a you problem. I don’t need you to listen to me or even like me, but you apparently need my approval for your stupid policies and ill-thought-out ideas, and therefore you need me a whole lot more than I need you. The only one hurt by my anger is you. You’re the one complaining about it.

                You’re fucking political parasites and I’m tired of it.

                Now let’s watch your dumb ass prove my point and do nothing but address my anger and my emotions while not addressing the needs of the disabled people who would be thrown under the bus with car bans at all. 🙄

                • gayhitler420@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Busses here have better accessibility than cars.

                  There are people who need more aid than the busses are equipped for and the bus line runs specially equipped shuttles out to them on request at no cost (back when the busses had fares it cost the same as a bus ride).

                  • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It’s not that way in most other cities on the planet and you and I both know this.

                    And it doesn’t address one of the many serious problems with car bans – denying the disabled the right to travel on their own terms and not the bus services.

                    What happens when they cut routes or service?

                    Or refuse service for political reasons like during the lockdowns?

                    Or otherwise dictate when and where you get rides, or who can go with you, or how you travel, or how much stuff you can bring with you?

                    Or if the service becomes overwhelmed and they simply can’t provide rides to everybody?

                    It’s terrible and fucked up to expect the disabled to put up with it just so the c/FuckCars chucklefucks can get rid of what they deem as eyesores.

                • Ookami38
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Pot meet kettle lol. People are making actual arguments about how a walkable city is better for every class of person, not just one specific class, and you’re throwing them all out, without entertaining the thoughts at all, and with a fair bit of vitriol.

                  Any situation where the average person doesn’t need any special equipment (a car) to get their things done is going to be better for everyone. As a off the top of the head example, when no one else NEEDS to drive, for instance, the people who do need to can more readily. Or they can utilize other, cheaper, specialized equipment, like powered wheelchairs more easily, because everything is within walking distance and the streets aren’t packed with people in cars.

                  • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    That’s not what’s happening but thanks for showing the class you haven’t been paying attention at all.

                    You know, if all you invested a fifth of a third of a quarter of the energy you’re investing trying to get something over on me onto building these walkable cities you supposedly care about, we’d all be on Saturn by now.

                • TheDankHold@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You accuse others of childish banality yet the only condescending jackass in this discussion is you as you lob insults and talk down to people.

                  News flash, walkable cities and public transit are better for disabled people than cars. Have a person in a wheel chair try to drive a car. Lets a blind person peel out on a motorcycle why don’t you you dipshit? Know how easy it is for a paraplegic to use a subway? They take a ramp or elevator down then roll on and off the cars as they please. Know how a blind person can get around without needing a friend with a car? They can make their way to a bus station where they can be taken across town.

                  Oh and finally, a “car ban”? Who mentioned flatly banning cars you disingenuous idiot? We want to design infrastructure for more than just cars, not ban them.

                  One way to come across as childishly banal and negative is to rant at someone for how bad of a person they are because of your own idiotic assumptions about their position.

                  You’re an insanely unserious person so log off and look into what people are actually advocating for instead of swallowing gallons of bullshit from people that know better. It’s unbecoming of someone with your smug sense of superiority.

                  • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    And here’s stupid motherfucker number 1 coming down the hall and up to the stage to prove my point.

                    This isn’t a conversation about your feelings or mine, this is a discussion about the viability of walkable cities for the disabled. And they’re not viable for people like that and never truly can be, not without cars. So unless you assume every resident is riding around in a wheelchair and plan accordingly, which you can’t do because most major cities were built way before the ADA and similar laws in other countries were passed – even before the wheelchair and walkers were invented.

                    What you want requires trillions of dollars in investment you are never going to get. Not unless you do what I told you to. I gave you stupid assholes a solution, but you’re still not listening. Why?

                    Because for you, this is all about your feelings and not about building a better world at all.

                    You’re up in here writing walls of text to personally attack me, like you always do, because all you care about are your stupid fucking emotions. And I emphasize your emotions.

                    You clearly don’t give a fuck about the old people who will be trapped in their houses, isolated and alone, because they can’t make use of anything other than a car.

                    You don’t care about the motherfuckers in wheelchairs who you will be effectively imprisoning either.

                    You sure as fuck don’t care about me other than “How can we exploit this asshole’s anger to make them look bad and win the argument?” because all this is about for you is winning an epic battle against me that is only happening in your own head, because I hurt your feelings by telling you facts you didn’t want to hear, and now you’re getting revenge.

                    I called you stupid assholes and you, personally, a stupid motherfucker and you will not display one bit of temerity or maturity at all by ignoring it; in fact, that’s all you’re going to talk about because all you care about is how you feel. Not the actual topic of debate.

                    And that’s why I don’t like you, and I will continue to be an asshole to you until you change, and not before. Like I said, you need me a whole hell of a lot more than I need shallow, stupid, petty, selfish, emotional and violent scumbags like you.

    • Ookami38
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do disabled people who can’t drive get their groceries?

      About 2 seconds of critical thinking leads you to this magical solution called “someone helps them” in both cases.

      • PvtGetSum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not like super pro car or anything but your argument in my experience doesn’t really hold up. I work at a farm and we have a lot of elderly folks come in and shop by themselves. They drive themselves and shop themselves but I doubt they could do that with a walker and if they didn’t have a car I doubt they’d be finding a different way to come out here.

        • Ookami38
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Rural life is a whole different beast from urban. I won’t ever make the argument that rural living people shouldn’t have cars. So yeah, plus one for that argument.

          • PvtGetSum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Rural life definitely, but I’m in suburbia hahaha. I just can’t imagine public transportation being able to replace what a car can do for elderly people

            • Ookami38
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If the individual is so bad off they can’t manage to get on a (more robust than we currently have) form of public transit, I really question if they should be driving. The simple fact of life is that at a certain point, maintaining complete independence isn’t a reality. This isn’t a bad thing, we should be moving towards embracing building the systems we need for people to get help at that stage of life.

              • PvtGetSum@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                These people have no problem driving or taking care of themselves, I’m sure plenty shouldn’t be driving, but doing something like shopping and then walking your groceries back home simply isn’t an option for a lot of people even if public transportation was more robust. Sure, past a certain point everyone loses independence, but there are plenty that don’t need to that you are advocating should

        • Ookami38
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Friends. Family. Building facilities. Government programs.

          The simple fact is that at some point, people just can’t be completely independent. It’s the nature of growing old. This is only really a problem because we have such a strict independence culture, where if you can’t do for yourself, you may as well just die, society doesn’t have time for you.

          If we recontextualize this, and see growing old and more feeble not as some personal failing and instead as the symbol of a long life, if we start looking out for those around us, and if we start building up the facilities we need to allow people to gracefully enter elder-hood without stigma, we’d all be a bit better off.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        And that just shows a lack of empathy or life experience.

        You can’t always get help so you need to be able to get where you want to go on your own, and that means disabled people need cars.

        • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In what world is a disabled person able to board a car on their own but not a bus or train? And in what world are those busses and trains not staffed with people to help? Are we talking self-driving busses and cars with wheelchair driving options as a standard?

          Edit: Seems the response is for the disabled person to: JuSt SpEnD mOrE mOnEy ; but we couldn’t possibly be bothered to spend more on public transit to make it more accessible.

          • Carlos Solís@communities.azkware.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            At least in my country, bus drivers that need to help people in the wheelchair to get up on the bus are already at the edge of their patience. Don’t even talk about helping them stuff seven bags of groceries as well. That’s why unfortunately, taxis are still a necessity

            • Ookami38
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think the best solution, if we can redesign our cities, is to incorporate more mixed use buildings, or at least more mixed zoning. Why even have to have a bus if your building has a connected grocery and 3 other small shops on the same block.

              These issues only really exist because everything is SO spread out. We have strict zoning regulations that mean having a grocery in a residential area is at best a challenge, and realistically impossible. This means we have to go further for the most mundane daily tasks, and this means we need more robust transportation, including cars.

              ETA:rereading this it looks like I’m making an argument for no cars, buses or anything. I’m absolutely pro expanding public transportation, merely stating that if things were slightly different, you could eliminate the bus entirely from this situation specifically

          • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The car is in their driveway, where is the bus?

            If we want piblic transport, and I certainly do, we need better aguments than this one.

            • Ookami38
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure this applies for suburban or rural life. Everyone has the space to have a car there. In a city, which is what my entire argument stems around (you can see elsewhere in this thread where I state I wouldn’t ever dream of taking cars from rural people), it’s more like “the car is in the parking garage connected to the apartments. And the bus stop is just in front of the apartments, maybe down on the corner”

        • Ookami38
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t say it had to be an individual who needed to help. It could be any number of programs, services, or even yeah, individuals.

          I mentioned mixed use buildings in another part of this thread, something like an apartment complex with a bodega-like grocery on the first floor or directly attached. What about moving more towards that kind of building? There are a ton of solutions that don’t require cars.

    • ShouldIHaveFun@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do disabled people who can’t drive get their groceries in a car centric city?

      If you can drive a car, you can probably also drive an electric wheelchair. This should be sufficient to take public transit or go to a nearby store.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        By having specially designed cars that enable them to drive.

        Even the ones who by the nature of their disability can’t do anything mentally or visually taxing, like drive, don’t disprove or negate the need for cars because everyone else with disabilities need them to get around. Public transport simply isn’t suitable enough for them.

        Even old blind people who can’t pass driving tests use Uber or Lyft, because public transport simply isn’t safe or suitable enough for them, especially during grocery runs.

        • ShouldIHaveFun@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even old blind people who can’t pass driving tests use Uber or Lyft, because public transport simply isn’t safe or suitable enough for them, especially during grocery runs.

          You are assuming a car centric city here. In a walking and transit oriented city, it is safe and suitable for blind people to be independent and move by themselves. Only cars make the cities unsafe and the lack of transit makes it unsuitable to use something else than a car.

          • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            And I am assuming that because they are the norm you’re complaining about in the first place.

            If they’re not, then go move to one.

            It’s as simple as that. But you don’t get to demand other people lose their cars just because you don’t like them, especially disabled people that will always need them as no walkable city will replace the individual autonomy, carrying capacity and convenience a car provides.

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You seem to live in a car centric city with really shitty public transportation. My city has decent regular bus service and for those who need extra help, they have more handy centric busses that will directly pick people up on a schedule. I think even the tiny town I grew up in has a service that does the same because there are tons of older people that are not able to drive. We also have a shuttle service to the train station if you live too far away from one.

          There are solutions to these problems that tons of cities have had no problem implementing. It sounds like either yours is not one of them or possibly it is not a service you need so you just plain do not think about it.

        • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Public transport simply isn’t suitable enough for them.

          Ding dong, you’re wrong. Walkable cities are more accessible for everyone than the carcentric dystopia.

          • rug_burn
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ding dong, you’re wrong.

            I have an older retired mother who uses a cane and can easily move about once she gets into the store by using the cart to stabilize herself. Taking public transportation is a no-go where she lives, because the one thing that I haven’t seen mentioned here yet, is crime. As an older woman with a walking aid, she’s the prime target for criminals, who also know old and elderly tend to not trust banks and use cash.

            I do what I can to help and support her, however this is not always feasible, and in her words, she’d “be damned if she wasn’t able to get out of the house and do her damn shopping herself”.

            And she’s able to drive just fine. But I guess she should give up her car, her freedom, so you can feel better about, whatever the fuck you think it is that getting rid of cars will fix.

              • rug_burn
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Public transport simply isn’t suitable enough for them.

                Ding dong, you’re wrong. Walkable cities are more accessible for everyone than the carcentric dystopia.

                And you literally quoted someone talking about public transport, so there’s that. Can’t wait to see what fun things you come up with to call me this time.

                  • rug_burn
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Uh, ever heard of commercial and residential zoning? You can have a Bodega down the street and a big box store 5 miles away. Both can coexist in the same city. Unless you’re talking in absolutes, which seems like pretty poor city planning. Not sure where you’re from, but in the US such things exist.

                    Loving the insults too, BTW. Keep them coming!

              • rug_burn
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Walkable isnt “walkable” for someone who has trouble walking. Brainwashed? Hmm. Explain. And twat? There’s two reasons you’d use that word, you’re either European or Australian, and if that’s the case, I’ll take twat and wear it as a badge of honor. The other case is you’re American and around my age or older where that word would be in our vernacular, in which case, at least you didn’t call me a cunt, because then I’d be really sad.

    • LucyLastic
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      At 85 years old my Mum can’t drive or walk, she does her own shopping with an electric mobility scooter and occasionally needs the help of others … that works fine for her because she lives in what might be called a “15 minute city” these days.

    • adriaan
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a bit floored by this being a question at all, my condolences. Depending on the disability, a bike, e-bike, mobility scooter, or microcar.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        So in other words, disabled people still need cars – they can’t ride bikes or e-bikes and scooters are too small for them – and you didn’t think about what you’re saying.

        • adriaan
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          What? I said it depends on the disability. Depending on why you can’t walk to the store, a bike or e-bike might work. Not every disability is the same. I know people that can’t walk to the store but can use an e-bike.

          How is a mobility scooter too small for a disabled person? It’s literally designed for the purpose. And by Microcar I mean what you see in Amsterdam as microcars, not ‘a small car’.

          • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            As a disabled person who can’t drive, I ride my ebike everywhere. I can easily fit a week’s worth of groceries because it’s a cargo bike, which makes it even easier to balance and steer because of the way it’s weighted.

            Im lucky to live in an area that is becoming increasingly bike friendly. 10 years ago I barely left the house because it wasn’t safe to ride on the road, and I couldn’t afford uber/taxi, and there were no accessible bus stops near me.

            When something is more than 20km away I will take a bus or an uber - but there’s no reason that uber couldn’t be a microcar, or a light vehicle (like an electric version of the old milkman lorries) for those that need ramp access or electric wheelchair transport.

            At the moment in many places, disabled people are already forced to use paratransit systems because adaptive cars and taxi services are prohibitively expensive.

            There will always be a need for some people, and some communities to have and depend on cars. The goal is to reduce this to as few people as possible by making it easier for those that are able to choose other methods.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Generally there is at least one bus stop or train stop by a grocery store. The amount of walking is roughly the same.