• pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    And that just shows a lack of empathy or life experience.

    You can’t always get help so you need to be able to get where you want to go on your own, and that means disabled people need cars.

    • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In what world is a disabled person able to board a car on their own but not a bus or train? And in what world are those busses and trains not staffed with people to help? Are we talking self-driving busses and cars with wheelchair driving options as a standard?

      Edit: Seems the response is for the disabled person to: JuSt SpEnD mOrE mOnEy ; but we couldn’t possibly be bothered to spend more on public transit to make it more accessible.

      • Carlos Solís@communities.azkware.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        At least in my country, bus drivers that need to help people in the wheelchair to get up on the bus are already at the edge of their patience. Don’t even talk about helping them stuff seven bags of groceries as well. That’s why unfortunately, taxis are still a necessity

        • Ookami38
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think the best solution, if we can redesign our cities, is to incorporate more mixed use buildings, or at least more mixed zoning. Why even have to have a bus if your building has a connected grocery and 3 other small shops on the same block.

          These issues only really exist because everything is SO spread out. We have strict zoning regulations that mean having a grocery in a residential area is at best a challenge, and realistically impossible. This means we have to go further for the most mundane daily tasks, and this means we need more robust transportation, including cars.

          ETA:rereading this it looks like I’m making an argument for no cars, buses or anything. I’m absolutely pro expanding public transportation, merely stating that if things were slightly different, you could eliminate the bus entirely from this situation specifically

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The car is in their driveway, where is the bus?

        If we want piblic transport, and I certainly do, we need better aguments than this one.

        • Ookami38
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure this applies for suburban or rural life. Everyone has the space to have a car there. In a city, which is what my entire argument stems around (you can see elsewhere in this thread where I state I wouldn’t ever dream of taking cars from rural people), it’s more like “the car is in the parking garage connected to the apartments. And the bus stop is just in front of the apartments, maybe down on the corner”

    • Ookami38
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t say it had to be an individual who needed to help. It could be any number of programs, services, or even yeah, individuals.

      I mentioned mixed use buildings in another part of this thread, something like an apartment complex with a bodega-like grocery on the first floor or directly attached. What about moving more towards that kind of building? There are a ton of solutions that don’t require cars.