• yokonzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m torn between wanting Activision to get new management and not wanting Microsoft to aquire two major companies and dominate the market

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s really bad. This is all about Game Pass. MS wants to acquire enough of the industry big IPs to force people onto Game Pass. All of tech right now is trying really hard to get people locked into subscriptions because it’s effectively free, easy money. You don’t have to convince consumers to constantly buy new stuff. You just need to dissuade them from canceling a subscription, which is much easier.

      Then they just gobble up more of the market share until they’ve hit their theoretical maximum. Then they can raise prices because they’ve captured the market and driven competitors away. They’ve already made it so you pretty much need Game Pass if you own an Xbox. Long-term they could stop selling PC games on Steam, but they probably won’t because the PC market is so much smaller than console and they can point to that as a “win” for consumer choice.

      Sony has nothing successful enough compared to Game Pass and as they fall further behind they’ll likely abandon it entirely.

          • Khotetsu@lib.lgbt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it’s a bit of both. King is a big name in the market, but mobile gaming is just such a massive revenue stream for companies anyways. IIRC, the mobile market accounts for more money than all other gaming markets combined.

            • vaultdweller013
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Which I still hold as fucking stupid, why play a shitty mobile game when ya could just emulate the entire SNES games catalogue.

              • Sarcastik@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Those aren’t the same customer demographics. The overwhelming majority of mobile phone gamers don’t know the first thing about emulators. Not to mention, other factors like mobile games being designed to tap into addictive triggers in the brain, social engineering, etc.

    • Heratiki@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean when Microsoft purchased Bethesda it made things better than they were at the time and we got access to a lot more older titles. Just look at what Redfall was and then compare it to Starfield. Microsoft didn’t have any hands in Redfall but did in Starfield.

      • Khotetsu@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think this is really a good comparison since Starfield was in development for years before Microsoft came in. Plus, Redfall was forced by management to shoehorn in a live service model with mtx during its development, butchering what it had been before.

        And, this is just my personal opinion, but I think Starfield is a pretty mediocre game. Besides the ship design, it’s largely the same design that Bethesda has had since Oblivion.