The new study, which looked at outcomes over 10 years, shows those fears aren’t unreasonable – commuting by bike is associated with an increased risk of admission to hospital for injury, with 7 per cent of cyclists experiencing such an injury compared to 4.3 per cent of non-cyclists. Squint a bit, and you can turn that into the “50 per cent more likely” figure mentioned above.

But Paul Welsh at the University of Glasgow in the UK, who led the study and who cycles himself, says the risk of death from cycling injury is vanishingly small. In fact, it is far outweighed by the decreased risk of death that comes from the increased physical activity and lower BMI of cyclists. “The data are still very much in favour of cycling for those who are capable of doing so,” says Welsh.

Cyclists have a far lower risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and death compared with people who drive, take public transport or walk to work – a finding supported by this and previous studies. If an extra 1000 people took up cycling for 10 years, we would expect to see 15 fewer cancers, four fewer heart attacks or strokes and three fewer deaths in that group.

Sometimes, people online and in real life ask why I complain about unsafe or lacking bicycle infrastructure but continue to put myself at risk by cycling. Is it worth it? Yes it is. Even from the perspective of self-preservation, cycling is safer than driving. I’d just like it to be even safer, and make it so that more people can benefit.

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I started commuting on bike last year and I do worry about being injured, so it’s a relief seeing that the health-benefits outweigh that risk.

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this reassured me too. Especially because the benefit doesn’t seem to be small, but overwhelmingly in favour of cycling even with the increased risk of accidents.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the largest caveat to this article’s claim is that it’s very dependent on the local environment. The UK has better biking infrastructure than the vast majority of the United States, where bike lanes are mostly a suggestion.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Indeed, the US is unfortunately a huge outlier. These charts comparing the US to other countries are shocking. The US is apparently one of the only developed countries that have gotten less safe in the last few years for non-drivers.

          It’s especially egregious when you consider that Canada has less than half the accident rate, despite similar city design. Canadian cities are getting safer for cyclists every year.

          That said, if you live in a place with good biking infrastructure in the US, I suspect it’s still worth it to bike.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeap my city started putting in bike lanes last year, but a lot of it was done by turning a two lane street into a single. People just ignored the new paint and continued driving on the bike path, so they attempted erecting those flimsy reflectors. People literally just ran them over enough to destroy them.

            But my city may be an outlier, I do live in the most conservative state in the union. We have had several people run over and murder cyclists for simply existing.

            live in a place with good biking infrastructure in the US, I suspect it’s still worth it to bike.

            Surprisingly Minneapolis is probably one of the nicest cities for commuting via bike I’ve ever been too. Prob the only city I’ve been to in the US that feels safer for bikes than the UK.

      • wazoobonkerbrain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for posting. I cycle everywhere even though I am also terrified of getting hit by a car. My brother’s friend got killed that way. One thing that the statistics don’t tell you is that you can reduce your chances of injury by being super careful. Look all around you, assume that every car on the road is trying to kill you, and do your best not to even get into their path whenever you can avoid it. If you see a motorist driving dangerously in your vicinity, just get off the road. That on top of all the normal advice like, you know, always wear a helmet, don’t cycle at night without lights, etc.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s my thought too. My friends and acquaintances who cycle the most haven’t had a single accident in years. Defensive cycling is a skill.

          It’s like that line from gun safety: “Every gun is loaded.” Every car will not stop or follow the rules. They will blow through stop signs and lights. Turn without looking. If you treat every car that way and adjust your trajectory and speed accordingly, the chance of an accident is tiny.

        • ForestOrca@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Many towns have put money and effort into bike/pedestrian paths. Using those I can usually avoid a majority of car traffic. Actively choosing less traffic’d routes should also improve safety.