• festus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    My guess is ‘recessive’, in the context of dominant and recessive genes. The only time I can remember ‘dominant’ from when I took biology.

    • Steve@compuverse.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s probably what they were looking for.

      In that context, I might argue the actual opposite would be non-coding DNA. As both dominant and recessive are still functional DNA, they’re not so much opposites as they are alternatives.

      But I’ve made those kinds of arguments in school enough, to know the teacher still probably wouldn’t accept my debating semantics. Even if they admit I’m right.

      • Evilsmiley
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah i did that a fair bit in school until i realised that everyone doesnt literally mean everything they say.

        So the reason people get snippy is that they think you know what they meant but are nitpicking to be disruptive, since everyone should have understood what was meant, to their minds.