• Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Based on my use of AI chatbots for story writing (chatgpt not included for different reasons), I personally have a somewhat negative view in general of the fact that, to me at least, the stories are average quality. Another downside is they pretty much all end with a happy little moral like message like “Benny found from that day forward he would work extra hard to make sure to do the right thing after he realized his mistakes.” Almost always, except with my early tests with chatgpt, ended with anywhere between a sentence or a short paragraph with a happy little message.

    Also, I am also one of those people who is less likely to like your art if it looks similar to an AI generated image/style because I absolutely do not like how soulless it feels compared to art an actual artist has made.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because you are using a chat/instruct fine tuned version of the LLM.

      Don’t think that represents what is actually currently possible for creative writing with a SotA LLM.

      Part of their fine tuning step was literally to make it come across as more soulless than it was in the pre-release version, which was still a chat/instruct model (just an earlier version) and yet coming across as too human-like to users.

    • h3rm17
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thing is, most art by people calling themselves artists is still soulless, pretentious shit. With AI at least it’s aesthetically pleasing.

      Also, your experience with AI chatbots might be a problem with prompt engineering. Thing is, these generarive AI’s results are directly correlated to the effort you put in precisely explaining what you want in a way that it understands.