Watch something else? There’s a functionally infinite amount of content out there, and most of it isn’t about billionaires.
You have come to the right comm
Watch Fleabag.
deleted by creator
The Last Jedi tried to go with “anyone can be a hero” and hoo boy were people not happy.
Movies are not always about billionaires, so your premise is incorrect.
Here’s a short list off the top of my head …
- Die Hard
- Rambo
- Rooster Cogburn
- Moana
- Predator
- Star Wars
But movies are often about escapism, and rich people can often do things we can’t do.
Also it’s a great plot device. Minimum Wage Tony Stark couldn’t be Iron Man (despite the fact he built the Mark I suit in a cave).
The fact that Tony Stark is wealthy being imagination helps in the suspense of disbelief. The same could be said about Bruce Wayne.
Haha, one title I was thinking of posting was “When it’s not about cops or special forces, it’s about billionaires”, so you’ve largely proven my point.
Even then, if you want a struggling superhero, there’s Spider-Man.
Rooster Cogburn, the 1975 sequel to True Grit, feels oddly out of place in that list. Blockbuster, blockbuster, serviceable sequel to a genuine classic, blockbuster, blockbuster, blockbuster. I really don’t mean to be critical, the protagonist is clearly not a billionaire so it fits, but I am very curious as to the reasoning.
Let’s be fair to usher. It is about a family of billionaires dying.
Glass Onion is easy: annoying tech guy trope (musk, zuck, SBF)
Loot is obviously a reference to Melinda Gates/whoever divorced
I’d say so much billionaire content because our society pays a lot of attention to billionaires. It’s not like we have Royals anymore. Wealth/power fantasies.
Even in the fictional worlds, they make them about kings/emperors etc. (Game of Thrones etc.)
I’d say so much billionaire content because our society pays a lot of attention to billionaires.
exactly: it’s an example of how the media indoctrinates those values
I feel like this is pretty flawed. You basically have collected four tv shows from the same ‘rich family drama’ genre and then asked “why are all these rich family dramas about dramatic families with lots of money?”
And even then glass onion barely feels like it stands in the list you’re trying to make because there’s plenty of crime and detective dramas that don’t focus on the super wealthy.
And even then glass onion barely feels like it stands in the list you’re trying to make because there’s plenty of crime and detective dramas that don’t focus on the super wealthy.
This is incorrect. It’s a convention of the genre that an heiress/tycoon gets murdered and the detective tries to solve it, typically in a mansion.
This goes back to Agatha Christie, unlike OP was saying, but it seems pointless to deny the class bias exists. Obviously the class bias exists.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/a_murder_at_the_end_of_the_world — “A Murder at the End of the World is a limited series about a Gen Z amateur sleuth and a billionaire’s guests who…”
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/arrow — “When presumed-dead billionaire playboy Oliver Queen returns home…”
Just skimmed thru a list of slop: Schitt’s Creek, Gossip Girl, The White Lotus, Below Deck all seem to be about the haute bourgeoisie.
What are you trying to claim? That they’re not overrepresented ?
I’m not trying to claim anything. I’m saying, to my ears, it sounds like you’re just complaining that a genre of storytelling and that tropes within certain genres just exist.
Why not try promoting the work you feel is underrepresented? What are some ‘better’ things we could be watching instead of the ‘slop’?
I’m saying, to my ears, it sounds like you’re just complaining that a genre of storytelling and that tropes within certain genres just exist.
I am yeah.
Why not try promoting the work you feel is underrepresented? What are some ‘better’ things we could be watching instead of the ‘slop’?
See: [email protected]
Drama has these things called “stakes.”
Money’s an easy one.
A lot of money is an intensifier.
