Removed by mod
Zsh is a nice balance of modern features and backwards compatibility with bash.
The article just describes the how, but gives no reasons for a why.
So, why would anyone move away from the de-facto standard bash, except for some rare circumstances like having a small system and using busybox?
You probably never used fish shell.
Yeah, and I suspect most reading the article haven’t either, so the above guy’s question stands - what’s wrong with Bash in comparison to the others?
Removed by mod
Nothing wrong with it, it’s just boring. Fish shell has some new features that make it nice to use. So does zsh. Tab completions, history navigation, plugins and such.
Why does something have to be wrong with Bash for Fish to be better?
Because bash is an industry-wide defacto standard?
And?
A lot of people use it for work and they couldn’t have the slightest risk of their setup broken since their living depend on it?
What does that have to do with the question?
Because you’re bored. It says so right in the title.
Personally I don’t see the point of changing the shell either. Bash is more than good enough for my use and any other shell is going to have the disadvantage of not being the ubiquitous standard so it is always going to have an uphill battle to dislodge bash.
That said, if people want to play around with a new shell just for the sake of it, why not? I like to play around with exotic window managers myself, not because my regular plasma desktop doesn’t suffice, but because I like to try something different every now and then.
Fish is actually user friendly and easy to learn. The interactive completions are better than any other shell and are something I don’t want to live without.
It differs from bash in some esoteric ways, but any issues you might encounter as a result are easily worked around by putting shebangs in your scrips, which you should be doing anyway, and
bash -c 'your command'.Honorable mention for
nushell, but that one differs from bash a little too much to pick up quickly. However, having an object-oriented shell is pretty sick.
Bored with driving your car with a wheel and pedals? Change the default handling device in your vehicle
Change your steering wheel into a tuktuk-style handlebar!
ZSH 4 lyf
tip: don’t install fish or whatever, change your default shell, THEN uninstall fish because you don’t like it.
Change your default shell back first.
I have seen way too many support posts where people paint their self I to a corner doing that.
or just don’t change the default shell.
run
fishas needed, thenexitback to bash when done.I have
Add it to your .bashrc so it autolaunches, but fails back to bash.
Honestly I prefer https://ohmyposh.dev it’s damn nice. Not that it’s a different shell, but makes any shell look nice
It looks pretty, but IMO one of the selling points of zsh is that it allows async updating of the prompt, allowing you to use slow commands like “git status” without adding a delay every time the prompt needs to be printed.
E.g. the default prompt from prezto is quite light and responsive, but when inside a git repo adds the info on the right side (shows when you have commits ahead/behind the remote branch, stashes, modified/deleted/added/staged files, etc) when that becomes available.
Didn’t look like any of the example themes on ohmyposh.dev had the $RPROMPT stuff, which I guess would be difficult support for a cross-shell theming engine.
Nice. But I want to change the default terminal in gnome but gnome-files doesn’t respect my choice. …
This might be right up your alley.
i use nushell
I use fish
Stop posting these clickbait pajeet articles
I don’t see the clickbait. The title references how to change the shell, the article then shows exactly that.
I think you’re using clickbait as a meaningless buzzword for something you don’t like, rather than its actual meaning.
No one gets “bored” with a fucking shell. This is just cheap clickbait instead of adding a bland title.
You could have complained about the clickbait without racist slurs.
