Um, how isn’t this a thing already? (Millionaire=people who earn $1M yearly)
Sorry for Fox News, but it’s the best source with this headline and it says it’s bipartisan so we should probably be good.

  • cogman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    With a population of 300 million, 26 million translates into an extra $0.08 in taxes per person per year. An amount, I might add, that isn’t evenly distributed due to the progressive nature of our tax system. Is saving 8 cents per person really worth the added bureaucracy and potential for rollback of social programs? A million dollars can feel like a lot, I get it, but you really have to look at these sorts of social programs proportionally rather than in terms of absolute numbers.

    To put things in perspective, the Arlington cemetery is spending 3 million dollars just to remove a statue.

    The US gov could easily save 10 billion dollars, tomorrow, by reducing the defense budget by that amount. Buying a few less unused missiles and tanks. If we want to decrease the tax burden, then looking at the 700+ billion dollar military program almost certainly has a billion places to cut.

    Or we could increase the tax rate on people earning over $1 million a year to cover the cost of millionaires using unemployment.

    • Aatube@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is virtually no additional bureaucracy needed to carry this out as states already pay unemployment based on previous salary. To me, dividing it among many people doesn’t make it any better, especially since this is a state payroll tax so the poorer people pay more. Anything saved is anything saved.