- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
I’ll be honest, personally I think the nail in the coffin was the Spotify-deal. If Google had been able to prove that it either has no special deals or only with tiny publishers (so it feels more like helping the underdog) then I don’t think they could have claimed that Google is treating anybody unfairly.
You must log in or register to comment.
- Google colluded to protect it’s monopoly. Apple didn’t.
The end
Apple has other tools for that.
Yeah, Google … Such losers!
Read more than the headline before you post, tbh.
(edit)
Changed this because to be fair, if English isn’t your primary language you might be unaware that you can lose a court case, not only profits or market share. The word is used in a lot of contexts.They literally lost the court case
That graph is part of the reason why Google lost the court case, so yeah, you’re right I guess?
Why would this graph matter at all? Wasn’t the case in the US where Android has a smaller market then Apple. I don’t see why an American judge would take international numbers into consideration.
Same as people saying Apple doesn’t have monopoly. They sure as hell do in America and that would be all that matters. Otherwise why was any monopoly broke up since none have ever had a international monopoly.
