• fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    While ridiculous, there’s interesting context here.

    • Greenland has little to no economy
    • The ice is mined from ice that has already broken away from the glacier, thus not reducing any more than nature has already
    • Cargo ships bringing frozen food used to leave empty, now that same fuel is used to transport ice back instead of going to waste
    • The founder has always dreamed of a sustainable economy for Greenland
    • He is conflicted about how his work to do this in a sustainable way is being taken

    Lots of gray here.

    • Rhaedas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You answered all the questions I had when I saw this. It does really depend on the context. Another positive thing might be that the amount of ice they are able to transfer to be used as ice cubes in a drink is less fresh water melt that would have gone into the oceans (affecting things like the AMOC), which is one of many concerns about Greenland’s melting ice.

      • Poplar?@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The water from the ice will find its way to the oceon whether it melts in Greenland or the UAE though?

        • Rhaedas@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, with different effects. I’m not saying this will really have a measurable influence, but melt into Greenland waters is far worse than in most other places. Just look into papers discussing the AMOC slowdown and its causes.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well, arguably, maybe not.

          Relocating it into more distant water cycles kinda dilutes the dilution, so to speak. Rather than dumping a bunch of fresh water directly into salt water, it lets it trickle back slowly and gives ocean water a bit of a buffer to disolve more saline, and gives it a chance to get stuck on terra firma somehow.

          I didnt expect a good explanation for this, but harvesting broken glacier isnt a bad idea on paper.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    And glaciers are still not protected from idiots doing stuff like this because?

  • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wealth is much too concentrated in the hands of a few people. People do this as the planet heats up and poor die in the streets simply because they were born somewhere else.

  • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I see no future problems with this ever. Definitely not going to run out of ice any time soon!

    /s just in case.

    • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yes, but with a small chance of unknown deadly permafrost bacteria, therefore the price difference. ;)

      • deeferg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        If we could make sure the ice being sent contains some form of the plague that all these rich idiots get, we could really do a whole lot of good real quick.

  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wonder how long until they decide to cut out the middle man and just tell their patrons that its “glacier” ice.