• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The judge is trying to prevent any pretext to getting the case thrown out on appeals. It’s bullshit but having all this hard work go up in smoke because a brainless judge higher up found a tiny fault in an unprecedented case would be horrid.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      What a piece of shit system that cannot treat people equally… Fucking farce of a country.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        While it’s very stark, I doubt you’ll find many countries treating their billionaires the same as their workers.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              It’s the natural implication of downplaying the seriousness of something. Saying other countries suck too is not only what-about-ism, but is directly diluting the seriousness of the offense.

              “Everybody does it” is classic children’s logic and a fallacy.

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                I think the statement is more of a “It’s difficult to avoid this problem” than an “it’s fine because everyone does it”

                • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Again, I didn’t say it because I expect it to be the common interpretation. Why the fuck is everyone so confused by hedging against Poe’s Law?! Do you all fucking suck this badly at discussing nuance? Someone clarifies one thing and you’re… angry at them??

                  Fucking pathetic.

              • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I think you are looking way too hard into it based on whatever preconceived issue you have.

                Nothing you said has any baring on this particular issue.

                Absolutely no one here has said what’s going on is good.

                • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Good job failing to understand that this is not a conversation between me and you. I said what I said to avoid Poe’s Law. Just because you didn’t need the obvious stated does not mean everyone will avoid taking implications, even ones that aren’t strictly there.

                  If you think that’s unneccessary, then you should try having more conversations where you’re trying to get multiple people to understand something. You HAVE to be clear, or others WILL wander in to the weeds and take the completely wrong lesson from something.

                  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Considering I’m only one of many people that think what you’re saying isn’t right in this context, you should probably follow your own advice.

    • OpenStars@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Jokes on us: like police do all the time, if a judge wants to “find” such a fault - maybe by citing precedence from a thousand years ago? - then they will. Ofc there is no reason to make it easy on them.