• Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    F1 wants US $s for their stock

    F1 wants US eyes on their races

    F1 wants 3 US races

    F1 doesn’t want a 2nd US team

  • regul@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    What’s the shortest start/finish straight on the calendar? The only real limit to the number of teams in my mind comes purely from how much longer the cars are that at a certain point the grid has to wrap around the final turn. I don’t think we’re anywhere near that on any of the current tracks, though.

      • regul@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        who needs that when you can just spin up a street circuit anywhere

    • Microw@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      We used to have pre-qualifying for situations like that

      • PizzasDontWearCapes
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        F1 is much too expensive for teams to be able to afford to show up and not qualify for a race

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Is there any particular reason or regulation why the F1 races couldn’t use a running start like other categories? Where everyone departs from the pits at fixed intervals and then the race starts after a 0 lap. Is the grid start from standstill mandatory?

      • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        Standing starts are almost as integral to the identity of F1 as open wheels are. Right or wrong, F1 is almost certainly never going to switch to rolling starts.

      • regul@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Presumably you’d get less wheel-to-wheel racing, and considering that most recent rule changes have been in pursuit of more of that, it seems unlikely they’d take a course that resulted in less.

        • PizzasDontWearCapes
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, the first two or three laps are where the most passing happens and the cars generally set into a groove from there

          Spec series like Indy and F2 keep the cars closer together for the entire race so there’s action throughout

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t particularly want it one way or the other. I was genuinely asking since I don’t know a lot about the sport. I find it all boring and lame regardless but I’m open to learn and appreciate. But nobody seems to fucking know or care enough to answer the question. And just down votes, I suppose out of an imaginary insult or slight implied by the question.

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago
    1. F1 has lost its way
    2. The teams are too greedy for that sponsorship money so they block competitors
    3. F1 is too expensive. They need to massively LOWER the budget, stop the revenue sharing and double the number of teams.

    Also get rid of the stupid hybrid and go back to V8 or V10. Tone down the emphasis on aero and make cars that are raceable without all the aero tricks.

    F1 is boring. I only watch old F1, pre hybrid days and nothing else.

  • jorge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ah yes, teams as valuable as FIRST-Judd Racing, true legends of motorsport