• Transient Punk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s in a tantalizing place.

    137 light-years away

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      While that is kind of close to Earth in the grand scheme of things, the tantalizing place they’re referring to is the habitable zone around its star where the temperatures are right for the planet to have liquid water on the surface.

  • pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Around an M type star. It orbits 0.083 AU away from its star. Its atmosphere is probably long gone. Fuggidaboutit.

    • wahming@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why so? The article says astronomers are hopeful about the possibility of atmosphere and liquid water

      • pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Tidal locking plus solar flares.

        Every YouTube video from credible sources is filled with several unlikely ifs regarding habitable planets around red dwarfs. The odds are slim.

        Also, in general, I avoid journalists informing me what scientists are saying and get my information straight from scientist communicators. Journalist income is based on advertising views, and they think that “new exoplanet probably does NOT have aliens” won’t generate sufficient ad revenue.

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      M type stars are tiny and cold compared to the sun. For this reason they can host planets that orbit much closer. In this case the planet is inside the goldilocks zone which means it’s at the perfect distance for liquid water to exist.