• voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      https://www.eeoc.gov/sexual-harassment

      Although the law doesn’t prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not very serious, harassment is illegal when it is so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or when it results in an adverse employment decision (such as the victim being fired or demoted).

    • Nythos
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      164
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Simply asking someone for their number is not harassment.

      Repeatedly asking for someone’s number after being told no is.

      There isn’t any nuance to this situation.

      • quindraco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        209
        ·
        10 months ago

        Telling someone they’re beautiful when they think you’re gross is creepy/harassment.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          114
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s okay to talk to women if you’re a male model but stay the fuck away if you aren’t. Got it.

        • dfc09@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          71
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          “when they think you’re gross”

          How can I know if someone thinks I’m gross if I haven’t spoken to them yet? I should just assume I’m gross, always?

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Usually when they get the torches out and organize the rest of the angry villagers I know that they don’t think highly of me.

          • quindraco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            72
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s the fun part, you can’t. Don’t assume they think you’re gross, but do remember that you don’t know what they think.

              • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                10 months ago

                Or 3rd wave femanist. Hard to tell the difference sometimes 🤔

                (For examples, head over to TwoXChromosones for nearly identical hot takes as the commenter above yours)

            • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              But if I tell them they’re beautiful and it turns out they think I’m gross I could go to prison for harassment! Am I really just supposed to roll the dice like that?

              • quindraco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Harassment isn’t a crime, so you’re probably safe from prison.

                • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Oh, you’re right! I’ll only get sued and probably lose my job. That makes it okay then.

                  But just to think that none of that would have happened of someone sexier than I was had done the exact same things I had done!

        • Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Correct, but you won’t know if they think you’re gross until you talk to them. If you see that they think you’re gross, you stop. It’s harassment when you see that they think you’re gross but continue talking to them anyway, because at that point you know they aren’t going to respond well to you, and you’re just continuing on to spite them.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I ponder if people are comfortable expressing to someone they just meet that they find them gross? Hmm

            My point is there often is nothing to see because that’s actively attempting to be hidden. Good normal decent people don’t like the feeling of giving people bad news already but when it’s bad news about something so personal and also recognizing that not everyone gets dealt the best hand in life?

            It’s insane to put the entirety of responsibility to “read the room” on one person even if they are the initiator.

            This is where social contract comes in. We all need a new modern social contract we can agree on to help us remove these barriers of interaction.

            But i guess that’s the point of these types of works is to bring attention to that situation. It’s a valid observation i think, commentary on it aside for now

            • Signtist@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Well, if you’re actively trying to hide your disgust from someone, it’s because you don’t want them to know, at which point you obviously can’t expect them to react to it. Ultimately, it’s not about you trying to divine someone’s real feelings, instead it’s about reacting to what they do show you. It’s the responsibility of everyone who interacts with others in a public space to be knowledgeable about both verbal and nonverbal cues that someone’s not interested, so that they can display and/or recognize them as required.

              • Jarix@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                As far as i can tell we said the same thing. I will admit i have a hard time figuring our how to explain what im thinking so im not attempting to blame anyone here

                It’s the responsibility of everyone who interacts with others in a public space to be knowledgeable about both verbal and nonverbal cues that someone’s not interested, so that they can display and/or recognize them as required.

                This is part of what i envision a new modern social contract would take care of

                • Signtist@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  We have similar points, but I’m saying that it’s already the current social contract. Both parties are expected to respectfully respond to the others’ cues. Different people have an easier or harder time learning these cues, but there’s not really an excuse - we all have to work hard enough to get to the point where we can function socially in the community. Now, as is the case with any contract, there are going to be people who ignore it for their own benefit, not caring about how that affects others; such behavior generally qualifies as harassment.

                  • Jarix@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    I don’t see that as a new social contract though. That’s the one we have now

                    I’m proposing we come together to recognize a modern idea of what a social contract should be today.

                    It’s needs to be written, discussed, revised and ultimately accepted.

                    It seems to me not enough people acknowledges that this is even a thing at all. Cynical a that may be. We are talking about something similar it seems. Sorry I’m not the best at running down my thoughts. But i do appreciate you responding!

                    Different people have an easier or harder time learning these cues, but there’s not really an excuse - we all have to work hard enough to get to the point where we can function socially in the community

                    This is important to figure out. But it’s also why i see what we currently have as obsolete and not inclusive of our modern times.

                    We do not often compensate for people who don’t have the same advantages and opportunity to figure out those cues. Even when it is acknowledged. There are excuses i can accept for not figuring out on your own these cues. This is why i think the idea of a social contract needs more attention.

                    And i could accept that the need for something new doesn’t exist, maybe. Ill concede that my mind isn’t settled in this yet in in spite of already holding a form opinion already. But not without at least everyone being educated about it as much as you and i seem to be, flawed as that may or may not be. At least enough that no one can claim ignorance of it, and also be responsible for their own actions and decisions

    • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I hope you just have a feminine sounding name and you’re not a real life woman with this opinion.

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Garbage is definitely masculine and bagel is pretty neutral and taking into account everyone online is a guy, definitely a guy.

          • PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            No, no, no. See, your typical garbage bag has some smush to it, and a bagel has a hole! If we put these facts together, we can surmise that OP 3.0 is actually an earthworm with one of its ends sewed shut!

            …I don’t know anything about an earthworm’s sex, so I’m going to go with it being a neutral.

    • Soulg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, it isn’t.

      If there was a frame of her saying no, but then he doesn’t leave her alone, then sure.

        • Anamana@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Depends on how you do it. The way it’s portrayed here is weird, because they use the “is it sexual harassment…” phrase and kinda belittle the problem of sexual harassment within society. Makes me think he’s an avid Andrew Tate fanboy. So it’d be an instant “thx goodbye” from me.

          But if you just take the rest… I don’t think it’s harassment if you drop an honest compliment and ask for someone’s number.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Although the officer is “working” they are in public