• BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I am guessing not all that much.

    Public transportation is expensive to run let alone set up. The cheapest option of course would be buses but they don’t really help all that much since they get stuck in traffic too.

    • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Public transport is actually fairly cheap compared to building, extending, and maintaining car-centric infrastructure

      • TagMeInSkipIGotThis@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        And even if the bus is in the same traffic as the cars, there’s 40 people in the bus that would otherwise be say minimum 20 cars, so even bussing (probably the worst form of public transport) acts as congestion reduction, even if its not as nice for the patrons as a train, lite rail, trolley or other separated medium would be.

          • TagMeInSkipIGotThis@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I used to live in Wellington; 40 people on a bus wasn’t uncommon in rush hour when the whole aisle was full of standing passengers. I think I read somewhere once that the newer double checkers they have can do upwards of 70+ if its chock with standing folks.

      • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s a false comparison. The comparison isn’t “build more public transport or build more buildings”. It’s build more public transport or don’t build more public transport.