• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      A lot of university presidents get pretty close to that too, but many states (like Oregon) define universities differently and they’re not “true” public employees anymore.

    • SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Most public employees do not generate revenue because they provide a service but some college sports generate revenue. That revenue comes from ticket sales, contributions, and media rights for sports like football, basketball, baseball. Those highly paid coaches are paid from that revenue which also tends to fund many other smaller sports.

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I understand in principle why people object, but if you actually look at the finances, it’s generally not taxpayers footing the bill.

    • bloup@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If you read the article you link, it makes it pretty clear that the baseball team was highly involved in the project including lobbying the government for it and are obviously the main beneficiaries of it, so while it is true that “the funding is for a city owned stadium” attaching “not the team” to the end is dishonest, in my opinion.