• Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Never underestimate the ability of conservatives to ignore political messages that aren’t explicitly stated. Even something as in-your-face as TNG’s The Outcast is easily viewed by conservatives as “a funny alien story”, and not a metaphor for real-world political issues.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Amusingly, even the creators of The Outcast didn’t realise they were making an episode about gender identity. They saw it as an episode about sexuality, and about providing representation to gay people. Which isn’t an incorrect reading, obviously, but I think most people would agree that interpreting it as a trans allegory is a much stronger reading.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            The key to the gay allegory is to take a much less literal look at it. It’s about representation of a person who is ostracised for reasons related to the broad category of “sex and gender expression”. It is a metaphor, after all, so there’s nothing wrong with being less literal about it.

            Speaking of Riker, Jonathan Frakes wanted Soren to be played by a man, to make the message stronger to the contemporary audience. I think the studio chickened out?