• pissedatyall@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Absolutely not. This is how we got to “my James Bond is better than your James Bond”-style of thinking.

    Every new gen wants their own thing. Every new gen thinks the last gen was lame. Business takes old gen shit and add new gen actor/actress/good looking person, adds old gen shit and then resells the new gen its own version. This is why every show is full of pretty people and nothing new.

    • loutr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Most of the characters in Severance are not pretty, and it was very original IMO.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        There’s this concept called Hollywood ugly. Even people who are not pretty or considered to play ugly characters on film are still above average in terms of looks compared to the whole of the population. Most actors in Severance while might not be considered movie star out of everyone’s league gorgeous, are still pretty and attractive people. It’s much more about how they are presented in camera that makes them seem more everyday like.

        • loutr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah I guess John Turturro is a good example of Hollywood ugly :)

      • pissedatyall@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Severance is excellent and exceptional. It’s also AppleTV+, where it’s more likely than not you’ll see actors that resemble people in real life (and when it’s not, it’s Ghosted and shit). And they generally don’t do remakes.

        If anything, they’re the exception and not the rule.