• DarkGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Clearly medical knowledge acquired through critical study and evidence is different and more objective than political opinions.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The point is it’s not just an unsubstantiated opinion, there is a long history of political science, involving ‘critical study and evidence’. Terms like imperialist and neocolonialism aren’t buzzwords like ‘woke’, they have distinct definitions.

        • DarkGamer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          As you say, such characterizations are a matter of opinion. That’s quite unlike medical knowledge which is established by objective, not subjective, evidence. Generally I hear such accusations leveled at credible, mainstream sources that don’t fit the narrative of those on the far left.

          • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            They aren’t a matter of opinion though, there are defining characteristics accepted by a historied scholarly community that correspond with these words. There are ranges of perspectives as is common in any social science, so it is viewed as a ‘softer’ science compared to physics or chemistry but it is a science no less.

            It may be common for criticial leftists to use these sort of terms flippantly, but that doesn’t remove their meaning or usefulness in the larger discourse.