• Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Flavius Josephus, Pliny the Younger, Suetonius, Celsus, Tacitus, Thallus, Phlegon, etc

    Your book about fucking wizards is not a reliable source

    How come?

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because its got wizards and makes a lot of strong claims, including about wizards, that aren’t corroborated NY actual real historical documents, which we have for some of the times and places mentioned, including the Roman empire, who kept absolutely fucking anal records-in fact, when it split, we literally still use the word for half of them (byzantine)as the word for ‘absolutely fucking anal retentive bureaucracy’.

      Youre working with more literary analysis and like ‘oh hey here’s an accurate description of an eclipse, so this person probably saw one, they were in this part of the world, so we can guess when it was written’ type stuff than historical details. An ancient stone dildo tells us so much more about a culture than your book about wizards.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Okay, for a start, from the time of Jesus, we don’t have very many records. And the Byzantine empire didn’t exist until 300 years later, coincidentally when Christianity really took on. A good example is Pompeii. Basically all evidence we have for it is archaeological. There is only one written record which is written by a guy -surprise- who also mentions Jesus. The eruption of Mt Vesuvius was likely witnessed by around 250,000 people and killed many upper-class romans. In fact, the writings about Jesus are extraordinary as so many of them survived and exist in such a close timeframe to the existence of Jesus.

        Secondly,

        Because its got wizards and makes a lot of strong claims, including about wizards

        Gonna assume by wizards you mean Jesus being God.

        This is circular reasoning. “Jesus couldn’t have been God because there is no proof of Jesus being God, and the Bible isn’t proof because Jesus couldn’t have been God because there is no proof”

        Basically you’re saying “Prove to me Jesus is God” “Okay, here’s your proof” “I reject your evidence because it claims Jesus is God when Jesus clearly isn’t God”

        Thirdly, there’s archeological evidence of an early Church existing and early New Testament manuscripts from the second century. There’s even a stone tablet mentioning Pontius Pilate, which before it was discovered, critical atheists claimed was a fictional character.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Archaeology counts, dude.

          No you can’t prove to Mr that ‘Jesus was god’, because you would first need to prove god exists. I would’ve heard by now if you could do that.

          So anything youre saying does that I can safely dismiss as made up fantasty nonsense.

          I’m saying “prove this was a real dude who lived and was much better at community organizing than carpentry, and this is the same guy who some people think was an immortal wizard who isnt actually a wizard its complicated but whats important is he fought a balrog or whatever and helped frodo get the one ring to mordor before fucking off with him to valinor”. And apparently you can’t even keep the question straight.