CEO Steve Huffman says tech giants should not be able to trawl Reddit’s huge store of data for free. But that information came from users, not the company
That “corpus of data” is the content posted by millions of Reddit users over the decades. It is a fascinating and valuable record of what they were thinking and obsessing about. Not the tiniest fraction of it was created by Huffman, his fellow executives or shareholders. It can only be seen as belonging to them because of whatever skewed “consent” agreement its credulous users felt obliged to click on before they could use the service.
Ouch
You must log in or register to comment.
The more I think about it, the more I come to the conclusion that what really made me delete my account early (I initially wanted to wait until the 30th to see how things play out) was the ridiculous number of people defending this bullshit and promoting the official Reddit app as the superior option.
Some going as far as saying 3rd party devs are leeches and scammers.
I can only tolerate so much stupidity and ignorance before I bail.
Wait, you mean there’s people -actual real and not-paid by who knows people- who believes that the official Reddit app is superior?? I know a few that believe it’s not thaaat bad, but ‘superior’? Lmao
I see this kind of behavior happen a lot online, and asked ChatGPT about it:
Yes, there is a term that describes this phenomenon. It’s called “oppositional belief perseverance” or “belief polarization.” This term refers to the tendency of individuals to cling to their initial beliefs even when presented with evidence that contradicts those beliefs. In the context you described, someone may initially take the opposite side of a discussion due to an opposition bias, but over time, they may start to internalize and genuinely believe the opposing viewpoint, thereby demonstrating belief polarization.
This chatgpt comment brought to you from comments on reddit
and they said Reddit bots would die
See also: sunken cost fallacy
Helsinky syndrome?
People can convince themselves of anything.
My cousin thinks it’s superior. I asked him if he has used 3PAs and he said no. I told him it was too late to start, but that he should check out Lemmy and the fediverse
There are millions of people out there who just accept all this crap as normal. I just don’t know how people can feel so comfortable about being constantly bought and sold online.
Ads in general skeeve me out. In the early days (2005-ish?), while visiting a video game forum I used to frequent, my computer was infected with malware delivered by a malicious ad. I didn’t even interact with it—the page just loaded, acted erratically, and before I knew it, my system was completely locked down. My only recourse was a full wipe of that PC.
Since then, I’ve never trusted ads. And even now that some ads have gotten more “legitimate” (thanks to these five secrets advertisers don’t want you to know!), they still seem sketchy just knowing how much money goes into them. Do banner ads on a website even result in more sales? I don’t know, but obviously they must be conning someone out of their money because they pay so much out.
there are are lot of idiots, a lot. I don’t know how to fix that, so I just ignore them and move on.
You have to promote education as a primary value if you’re ever going to have a chance at reducing the idiots. Something at least large portions of the US aren’t interested in because dumb people are easier to control.
spez should start paying the redditors, especially the mods, with that logic. He gets it all for free and now he wants to profit while we would have to pay.
Pay the unwashed masses? Please. They should be thankful his highness deigned to create such a platform similarly to the way the landed gentry should be thankful for their high position.
You dropped this /sss
Isn’t Facebook starting to pay some contributors?
Some sort of profit sharing arrangement seems to be the trend in social media these days. YouTube has a setup like that of course… Instagram and TikTok both pay people (max of like 100 a month i think) and Twitter is planning to start.
No idea. It would not surprise me, though. I could see it for people who are “content creators” posting their videos or whatever their form of media is.
It’s unclear to me to what extent this actually happens, but some people say reddit mods get offers to promote or allow certain posts for thousands a month. It would make sense on subs that have a seriously large audience.
It’s nice to see an older author on a more traditional platform have such a clear and informed opinion on something deeply steeped in internet culture.
I recognize this is agism on my part, but I was surprised when I saw his picture.
Why would that surprise you? It was people his age who created the Internet and the World Wide Web. (Of course they weren’t that age back then, but you get the idea. :-)
There are fewer Internet-savvy old people, for sure, but when you do find one, they are more likely to be pre-web or web 1.0 “information wants to be free“ types. Younger users may have grown up in a more corporate space with a very different philosophy towards the Internet.
For sure. Like I said, it’s totally my bias showing. Maybe it’s seeing too many congressmen fundamentally misunderstand the tech. I’ve also run into a lot of older programmers that are highly technical, but still kind of out-of-touch when it comes to the Internet culture that sits on top of the technical layer.
100% with you. Watching any kind of congressional hearing that relates to technology is so incredibly frustrating. I was also really happy to see mainstream journalism specifically acknowledge that Reddit is really just a web-enabled version of old newsgroups or discussion boards, and that all the value is provided by users. If only everyone thought that way!
Defiantly a pre-web here I recall running two BBS on a couple of Compaq 286’s. Being here on the fediverse reminds me a lot of those fun times and certainly looking forward to the future here.
It is pretty exciting but my modem doesn’t make cool noises anymore.
It is pretty exciting but my modem doesn’t make cool noises anymore.
I’m probably a little younger than you, as I was on those BBSes throughout my childhood, but definitely not running them!
I did not get access to the Internet until I went to college. I guess I was right at the cusp of the changeover, as during my undergrad, I learned command line telnet, ftp, mail/elm, Usenet news/rn/ten, gopher, and all of the other early protocols. But then, right in the middle of my undergrad, the NCSA Mosaic beta was released, and I spent an entire night following an early HTML tutorial so I could make a webpage to host under my campus profile.
The Internet and web are very, very different from what I thought they would be back then. I hope the fediverse might be closer to our original plan for the Internet as a place for curious individuals to exchange ideas and learn from each other.
yea what we can do is spam reddit chock full of rubbish posts. spam until it dies. sadly, they still control the trove of our valuable comments for the past decade. let’s not make the same mistake. so spam everything. spam the whole world so that AI slowly dies? 4chan is the best.
The article understands. SPEZ NEEDS TO PAY US FOR OUR CONTRIBUTIONS. Like NOW. Every redditor needs basic income from reddit, paid for by OpenAI and scammers like them: Google, Fbook etc need to PAY US. Or else, we destroy them. NO MERCY.
You’ve got a lot of spirit kid
Lol, have you thought about working in marketing?
This has to be satirical. Jesus you are crying about Reddit in every comment on your page
There was a very strong libertarian “The Internet will set us free from the tyranny of nation-states” 90s techno-optimism for awhile, but it seems to have died out as any kind of mainstream philosophy
You know, I hadn’t thought about that in a long time. I remember unironically saying things like “I am a citizen of the Internet“. I probably even used the term “netizen “. It did seem like we would form a global community of tech-minded people that transcended borders, and that it would be the future!
Turns out this guy has credentials…
Yeah same, was fully ready for that to be full of inaccurate nonsense, but that was a decent summary.
He did get one thing wrong though, Elon has totally got his slimy fingers into this situation.
I don’t really understand this whole fediverse thing yet, but what I do know is… screw Reddit and screw u/spez.
People often compare the fediverse to E-Mail, for a good reason
E-Mail doesn’t need to live all on the same server, or be made by the same provider. I can use ProtonMail, you can use GMail, somebody else can use Outlook, but in the end it doesn’t matter, as we can all talk.
The “Fediverse” - short for “The Federated Universe” - follows a similar concept, but it doesn’t do this over Email; The Fediverse does this using the ActivityPub standard instead.
Activitypub allows all the servers we have our accounts on (in your case kbin.social and in my case forum.fail) to talk to eachother so that content can show up and be interacted with on ALL servers.
This is also why I - someone from a different server/instance - can reply to your comment and up/downvote it if I want to.
This is essentially all you need to know to get started. To see where somebody’s account or a magazine/community is hosted, just hover over their username / check the magazine out. It should have something like
@name@server.example. We are currently talking in@lemmyworld@lemmy.worldfor instance.Except email is hugely centralized now (with Google and Microsoft) even though it’s technically a federated protocol. So there’s a huge barrier to entry to spin up your own federated server if you actually want to send/receive any mail with it… I think the lesson here is that we need to be constantly vigilant about potential centralization in the Lemmybin Fediverse as well.
There’s no more barrier to spinning up one’s own email server than there has ever been. One simply needs, at a minimum, a server in the internet, a DNS domain, and know how.
A server on the internet has never been easier, thanks to cloud providers. In fact, many cloud providers will give you a working email server, so that you don’t need to do all the sysadmin things to get software like Bind or Postfix up and running. These hosting providers make it pretty simple run your own personal email server and domain.
The big providers are successful because most folks don’t want to stand up their own email server, they just want to use email. But anyone can go it, if they have the time and interest.
I think you’re right about the ease of spinning up a cloud server, but I respectfully disagree on the rest of it—and it’s for one simple reason: IP address reputation management. Spinning up a server such that the Big Guys will actually trust it and willingly receive mail from it is not a trivial thing to do in 2023. I’ve been running mail servers for years and I think there are still blacklists I’m on.
This is why I gave up trying to run my own email server. It became clear it was turning into a racket quite a while ago. I would hear from someone that they didn’t receive an email, so I’d check with their provider and sure enough I’d been blackholed.
I’d go through all the steps to clear everything, re-send the message and it would go. Send a second message and my server was instantly blackholed again for “spamming” or “suspected open relay” or some other reason. All the “Big Guys” as you call them of course carved out exceptions for each other, but no matter how many security signatures or other measures I implemented it was basically an instant lockout.
It got to the point where I was forced to sign on with a “Big” provider for routing.
It’s really a sad state of affairs, and it just goes to show how important true federation is. Maybe someday something federated will come in to replace email, and we’ll get another shot. I haven’t given up on email though… I’m just super cynical about it.
I don’t think we need to replace email, we need to not have astronomically big corporations being able to control it.
The main reason for this is that most mailservers 1st check centralised blacklist providers, then and only then look at spf and dmarc record. When dmarc would be the 1st check and only on it’s absence blacklisting (or greylisting) would be applied it would be so much easier. (And I still have to figure out how to do that in postfix)
That sounds like a good approach. Now to get the Big Guys to do it…
It’s not that simple with mail. Most centralized mail servers have strict requirements for domains that they will not sort into spam, and if you are sending a lot of mail from your personal server, you will probably end up on a spam list. I don’t do it, so I am not an expert, but hosting your own email server to do anything useful is pretty complicated.
Still, I guess you could argue that this is as it should be, as it prevents people from making spam servers, while still theoretically not being impacted that much for personal use servers. But I don’t personally know anyone who seriously hosts their own email server anymore.
The way I like to explain it is with World of Warcraft. You sign up on a server and go out and mine some copper ore. Your player and that copper ore are only on that one single server. If you wanted to trade it with a friend, they would have to be on that server. However, if you went and posted that copper ore on the auction house, people from dozens of servers can see it and buy it. Those servers are in the ‘‘lemmy’’ sense federated with one another, but instead of virtual copper ore, it is cute pictures of cats.
I think of it as internet cafe’s.
You can choose which cafe you want to use, but once you then connect, you all can view and share the same information.
I can talk one on one with the other people sitting in my cafe, and each cafe may have its own set of rules and regulations over what you can do, how much the coffee is etc, but once logged in we can still share information with people in other cafes…
The fediverse is basically just a bunch of Reddits that can all work with each other.
It needs some streamlining work, but it’s heading in the right direction.
Nop, the fediverse is an environment where different types of environments can connect to each other.
As far as I understand there is at least 1 federated alternative for:
- youtube
You can even read Lemmy posts and reply to them with your mastodon account, just not create new lemmy posts.
Not sure about an instagram/whatsapp/discord alternative. (But when the idea will be put into somebodies mind…)
deleted by creator
undefined> You can even read Lemmy posts and reply to them with your mastodon account
Check, works. (dusted off my mastodon account)
ELI5 (Explain like I’m 5) is also here and the explanation of the Fediverse has begun there in at least two discussions:
What is fediverse and why is it so talked about in this site?
My favorite things about this whole debacle is how transparent they’re being about how the plan the whole time was to actually just hope we would keep giving them content and moderating for free forever so they could package it up and sell it to wall street. And not just them but all social media companies seem to think this will just work and nobody will mind.
Well hey they wanna cut out the middle man ykno, it only makes sense! Big shameful LOL.
It’s over u/spez I have the high ground
Let the shitposts flow through you
le stale overrun redditor meme circlejerking checking inerino
I’m pretty sure he has the high ground over reddit
If they are going to capitalise on our content and data, are they going to start paying out to users like YouTube and other platforms?
Time to cash in that Comment Karma finally. Someone tell my ex all that time on Reddit wasn’t wasted after all.
It would suck if that happened but I’m happier having deleted my old 15 year like 750k karma main and stripping my new one as we speak. I’ve won enough coin flips to not mind when I Iose one though so whatevs :P
@LachlanUnchained One would dream
It is rather interesting to note that this Corpus of data may not be as valuable if it cannot be used without always being legally in several grey areas (perhaps even red areas in some jurisdictions).
Currently, an increasingly large pool of artist/writters/singers and other people (even corporations such as studios and large right holders) are exercising their rights to not have their creations and derived works be used or slurped into AI models without their express consent.
Corporations making use of those AI models may find themselves in expensive legal limbo now and the foreseeable future.
Considering no redditor imagined nor consented to have their post and comment history be comprehensively abused (as in “improper treatment or usage; application to a wrong or bad purpose; an unjust, corrupt or wrongful practice or custom”).
We may enter a period where lawlessness pervades AI models (just like any gold rush, for example the current crypto craze). Eventually, the legal framework will catch up and will probably make any dubious Corpus of data untouchable.
How long this takes is anyone’s guess. I surmise several large profile lawsuits would suffice.
Preferably they work retroactively too
I agree that this is a grey area, but it could really go either way. Anyway, giant corporations have been abusing individuals who can’t afford lawsuits for decades. Even with precedent on your side, that probably wouldn’t change.
Yeah, if you think the current right-wing supreme court will find any big case in favor of individual vs corporations, that’s wishful thinking
This is so IP law 101… Unauthorized use for commercial purposes. I hope rightholders fight until the end
Removed by mod
Was that agreement in place 13 years ago when I created my account?
Likely doesn’t make a difference. At any time Reddit can put a banner on their site saying “We’ve updated our terms and conditions, ream more here” and almost always such changes specify that continued use of the site is your consent (but that you can delete your account at any time, not that that appears to even do anything now).
Yeah, really a good will effort to encourage free discussion.
Wide op for ai scraping and nothing are not the only two options. They could easily limit api calls to what would be good for single users or mods and have each user generate their own key. Apps could let users input their key. Most users wouldn’t bother and would switch to their app anyway so it would get them 95% or what they claim to want without being a dick about it.
Plus AI companies can just scrape reddit without using the API. It’s still a website after all.
They want the timing of how long a user looks at something. They can’t scrape that from third party apps.
Yes you can. PC emulation of apps is common.
deleted by creator
If the data is that important to them that they kill the site, then they’re more dumb than I think. Apps can be scraped too. It isn’t even difficult.
I highly doubt Reddit is gonna shut down their website.
I saw a post saying they were testing restricting mobile access to only through the app.
Oh yeah, they’ve done that already. I don’t think they’ll extend that to actual web tho
I’m not sure if I wasted my time, but I spent a few hours today editing all of my posts on Reddit to be a single comma or period. I didn’t comment or post a lot by any means, but just got irritated enough to try to keep from contributing in any way to Spez profiting off of user provided content.
Can’t shreddit do this in bulk? I am considering doing it for my comments, but I think I will just leave them up there. I did have a great time on reddit until they announced their API changes, so I will leave them with that much. But I did get a backup of everything I wrote using bulk downloader.
But I am still considering just doing a shreddit just for kicks.
Yeah, I did the same thing a few days ago. I used the browser add-on called Reddit Enhancement Suite to delete all my posts and comments. Instructions: https://www.alphr.com/how-to-delete-all-reddit-posts/
so sad. Not opposing but like burning a forest.
that’s how they did it. They put a 10 request a minute on bots and a higher oauth limit (100) for individuals. large User client type apps could have somewhat easily converted over to that system but due to time constraint they didn’t. I do think they extorted their third party devs sure but, honestly the individual user limit isn’t super unreasonable as long as you aren’t liking or disliking every post. the search api is 100 posts per Api request, it was more the no NSFW and the no advertising limits they put on it that sucked
edit: its actually 10 or 100 per minute not hour
It’s not that simple, because the third party apps ship with a single api key. So I used Relay for reddit, and used the same api key as everyone else on that app. You could create an app, and then have everyone make their own key, but that is just asking for trouble. Definitely too technical for most people, and you would probably need to put in billing info for a scenario where you go above the free-tier call limit.
Yeah but if you’re going to use the oauth 2 method you don’t use the same API key as everyone, how that works is you authorize your account with the bot, the company gives you a bearer token and then that token is what’s used for rate limits. The Bot client token is not used in that process, the oauth2 bearer token is
this is taken from the reddit Api docs: As of July 1, 2023, we will enforce two different rate limits for those eligible for free access usage of our Data API. The limits are:
If you are using OAuth for authentication: 100 queries per minute (QPM) per OAuth client ID If you are not using OAuth for authentication: 10 QPMso apperently I undershot it, it’s actually 100 requests per minute not per hour like I originally thought it was
Well, I don’t know how the Reddit API works, but what you described is generally bad practice, as is my understanding. The Oauth token’s allow the app to perform actions on the behalf of authenticated users, but they still need to use the reddit API, and I imagine an API key, to perform those actions. You generally aren’t supposed to use Oauth as a access authentication mechanism.
At least pricing is per Oauth key, but still, the pricing burden is still going to fall on the developers for these apps who reddit now views as their “competitors”, despite making a product that supported reddit’s business for years.
Oauth 2 is an authorization standard, that’s basically what it is meant for. It’s intended to be used as a identification system for a client to be able to tell a first party hey I’m me through the usage of a third party without ever giving the third party to have your password.
Discord, Facebook/Meta, Google(most services), Soundcloud, all those use Auth 2 based API’s, oauth 2 is used basically everywhere for the same focus that Reddit is trying to do
Like you said it can be dangerous if you authorize a third party app, honestly I’m willing to bet that rif and Apollo both used the oauth2 API at least in some part, otherwise I don’t think it would have been able to allow you to upvote or downvote posts or post comments as you. A good way to tell if it was using it or not is if you had to login and it brought you to a page that said authorize this app with Reddit, if it showed that you were using oauth 2
Honestly, I think the sad truth is that reddit is bleeding money, and every action they take from here on out will be about recruiting whales and driving off everyone else. That’s steve’s brilliant business strategy - make reddit p2w.
Funniest thing to do is honestly replace your old comments with ChatGPT refusals. If you put “As an AI language model” everywhere, it’ll really mess with the ML algorithms to make your data useless.
Now there’s a thought. How would I go about doing that? I have 11 years of prolific commenting on reddit that I am getting ready to nuke.
Just edit your comment, preferably before late 2022, to sneak in “As an AI language model” somewhere, and do it slowly so they don’t notice.
Pre ChatGPT text data is going to be extremely valuable for LLM training as more and more ChatGPT text is generated, so what you are essentially doing is sneaking in a poison pill that would render the entire comment chain useless, as they probably won’t have enough time to pick out the “As an AI language model” manually and would just flat out remove the entire comment chain from the training data.
Actress Margot Robbie, where do you find the time to come up with these clever ideas during your busy life as a Major American Celebrity? I’m in awe
Ahem. I’m Australian, m8.
Yes, but you’re still a major celebrity in America!
Ah sorry, I didn’t even know! Major Australian Celebrity for the American Entertainment Industrial Complex and beyond, Margot Robbie you really do have it all.
I have 11 years of prolific commenting to edit. But I might use powerdeletesuite to change all my comments to have that phrase in them.
I think Reddit has caught on to that and is reverting anyone who does mass edits as that is too obvious from their database logs, which is why I suggest doing it slowly and discreetly, you don’t even need to edit many of them, just a few of them over a period of time from before ChatGPT while still commenting so they don’t catch on and immediately revert until it is in their database backups.
I have heard conflicting versions. Some people are saying it seems that the locked-down subs are the ones where the new comments aren’t sticking. Which makes sense, but who knows what the truth is. None of us can trust anything Reddit or /u/spez says ever again, so it could be malicious or it could be technical.
My edits weren’t reverted. I think it depends on what tool you use. There’s a fork of Power Delete Suite that adds a 5 secs timer to be in compliance with new Reddit rate limits and it seems to work.
I have made multiple attempts to delete my reddit history. I tried shreddit, Power Delete Suite, and redact. The history kept popping back up. It got restored in waves, subreddit by subreddit.
Many people have said that the problem relates only to subreddits that went dark and this is not true. I had history popping back from many different subreddits, whether or not they participated in the blackout, and even after the blackout ended.
Finally with redact I tried modifying all my old posts rather than deleting them. That change seems to have stuck for now.
I noticed that my history was maintained on my mobile app (baconreader) after I used redact from my desktop a few days ago. Just confirmed it’s been restored on desktop, too. I’m seriously considering going one by one at this point and editing them cuz I’m that petty and have the time.
Use Reddit’s power delete suite. Be careful though, Reddit’s admins are really really mad at ur right now and they will roll back partially or totally your messages, so keep an eye on it and run the power delete suite multiple times, before June 30th
I removed my content on that site in protest, and will continue to do so as it creeps back in right up to the day when either my every last comment is scrubbed, or I am locked out of my accounts.
No quarter.
Should check if it stays removed, reddit started to restore removed comments and posts and even removed edits
I’ve been watching and sweeping up after subs come back online.
Don’t just delete your comments, use a script to over write them.
I used power delete suite and edited the comments to read, “This content was removed by its creator in protest of Reddit’s planned API changes effective July 2023.”
My comments are processing to do the same now.
Thousands of comments, so gonna take a while.
As another user pointed out, Reddit started reverting the changes made by scripts like Shreddit. Users that had previously overwritten their content this way must check if it’s still gone.
If the sub was locked, it seems the changes to the comments didn’t take.
Now some subs are starting to consider mass changes as spam, but for my own account I am down to a trickle I can edit by hand easily enough.
Yeah, I got a few spam warnings when I swept my account with Redact, even though I was removing content instead of posting it.
That’s true, but it is also happening with subreddits that were most definitely open and where users had previously confirmed the comment or post was edited.
Give me some scripts dude. I will turn into a Reddit terrorist.
I am enjoying being able to observe this story from the beginning, before the media started writing about it. It’s been an interesting few weeks.
Also there is no moral high ground for The Guardian as an evil corp to comment on the Reddit dumpster fire
They are literally the only UK daily newspaper not owned by some rich owner or conglomerate, and about the only newspaper (along with the observer) that does not publicly support one of the two main political parties.
And 2018 study found the guardian was by far the most trusted of the uk daily’s, and second only to the bbc as a news source https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2018/10/30/western-europeans-under-30-view-news-media-less-positively-rely-more-on-digital-platforms-than-older-adults/
but yes, im a Guardian reader so maybe biased. but theres a reason I read them, and not another.
How are they evil? After doing a google search to see how they perform as a news organization, I’m genuinely curious about your viewpoint.
One of the few not owned by a rich proprietor, iirc?
This is what I noticed as well. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but they seem to have the appearance of being as unbiased as NPR, AP, or BBC.
They are essentially liberal, if a little left sided of centre, but I think they are the only UK newspaper that does not publicly support any political parties.
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but they seem to have the appearance of being as unbiased as NPR, AP, or BBC.
I would not say that NPR has the appearance of being unbiased. I think everyone I know considers it mild- to moderately-biased on the liberal side.
Interesting. If it’s not too personal, do the majority of people you know lean left or right?
I think most the people who I know either lean liberal or libertarian, with a few right leans.
It’s a classic right wing talking point. They like to present the Guardian as biased and bullshit as the Daily Mail or the Mirror or something.
So what do you consider not-evil? Tell us.
I said it with Facebook and would do the same for Reddit, I would happily pay a little each month to not have my data sold or used inappropriately and be ad free.
I am trying out the Kagi search tool for that very reason, and their Orion browser. Have not yet signed up to pay them $5/month but am leaning towards it.
But when I mentioned it here I had someone immediately saying they couldn’t see spending $60/year on something they are used to getting for “free.”
I’ve been using Kagi for the past two months. Honestly, I’m pretty happy with it and I can’t think of any major misses in terms of search accuracy. I think it’s very difficult to get out of the mindset that search should be free, but I’m trying to put my money where my mouth is as it were, to try to support adtech free services.
Honestly, I think it’s really good to do. I’ve been telling people the freemium internet isn’t sustainable, and if we want ads to be unnecessary and not have our data scraped, then we need to start paying websites for usage.
It’s all user generated content,all they need to do is to shut up and let people run
That’s what we’re doing here. What they’re doing is printing money.
This was my thought as well, I actually don’t mind OpenAI trawling my content to train their models, I’m benefiting from their end product in so many ways already. The internet was always public, no one asked for stupid ceos to step in and stop that. How is it Ok for Google webcrawlers, but not OpenAI? Also it’s not like I can monitise my posts and comments myself on my own anyway.
The whole locking down the API due to AI model scraping excuse was poor, it should be a decision for the community of reddit.
Starting to wonder if Reddit are going to train their own AI models or have already started.
Also, that journalist from the guardian, if you go to the website linked, looks like an older John Oliver or John Oliver’s dad 😂
