char (@[email protected])
ioc.exchange
@[email protected] Actually since yesterday I'm pondering about the idea to build a #federated version of stackoverflow, nothing written yet, I'm reading, researching. Also, right now I was checking this stack exchange sqlite db under CC BY-SA 4.0 to check how useful and doable would be import this data and using as a base for the federated version. Also wondering if we could use this data somehow to train our own opensource AI to help the community, but I'm do not have knowledge on LLM/AI things. Please if there is any expert I would appreciate the opinion on that. https://seqlite.puny.engineering

Codeberg was asking about this. The linked toot by a commenter points to :

SEqlite

These are CC-BY-SA 4.0 remixes of the Stack Exchange Creative Commons Data Dumps. 100% Unendorsed by Stack Exchange, Inc.

They are minimal. They provide the data you probably care about and the data you need to comply with the original license in SQLite format.

    • maegul@hachyderm.io
      2·
      6 months ago

      @ajsadauskas @lemmyreader

      Yep! It seems a good Threadiverse ecosystem could be on its way with lemmy etc, nodebb and discourse. Hooking a stack overflow alternative into that could make a lot of sense of kick starting it.

      Though at some point UI differences could prove problematic(?)

  • yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.mlEnglish
    13·
    6 months ago

    Honest question: Why?

    IMHO stack exchange is basically reddit/lemmy with hand cuffs because no threaded discussions and every other question is closed as off topic. I don’t understand what another stack exchange would buy anybody.

    I guess one thing stack exchange does well is “related questions” and tagging, but… I dunno. (shrugs)

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      18·
      6 months ago

      With a few more additions, lemmy could serve as a good replacement. We already have a Forum / NewComments sort which is perfect for question / answer type communities. We could add a feature to make default sorts for specific communities, so they would feel less fast, or possibly a sort that brings zero comment posts (IE meaning unanswered), to the top.

      The reputation and “accepted answer” features from SO are a lot less important than threaded comments can be, especially since questions often need new answers every year, making the “accepted answer” pointless.

      • Die4Ever@programming.dev
        4·
        6 months ago

        Especially with Lemmy getting support for plugins soon, I don’t see the need for making a new platform

        A new sorting method for “unanswered” is a cool idea. I’m not sure if it’s quite as simple as just finding posts with 0 comments, because people can put additional questions in the comments but it’s still unanswered. Also how do you sort them for posts with the same number of comments/answers. But this is definitely something that a plugin could handle.

        I saw someone else suggested we could just put “[unanswered]” in the title and then edit the title to “[answered]”

      • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
        2·
        6 months ago

        Default sort would be great. Especially for sports events. But I don’t want Lemmy to become an answer repository, keep it as a link aggregator

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        71·
        6 months ago

        And guess what, it can be done just as easily, if not, more easily on a federated instance. You don’t gain at real additional control over your data (and no putting “covered under license X” is about as realistic as those Facebook posts saying “I don’t give anyone access to my posts”).

        I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again, realistically the only way to control your data from AI is a DRM type solution which everyone fundamentally hates.

        • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
          1·
          6 months ago

          I don’t think this can be solved with any type of technology. It needs legislation. These AI companies need regulation.

      • huginn@feddit.it
        21·
        6 months ago

        Federated Stack Exchange isn’t harder for AI to eat. If anything it’s easier.

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      2·
      6 months ago

      Useful constraints would focus discussion to keep questions/replies brief, relevant, and hopefully helpful, wouldn’t they? I just wonder how up and downvoting would work since that would go very differently from Lemmy.

        • LostWon@lemmy.ca
          1·
          6 months ago

          I’m sure this has been solved already but I’m just wondering how you ensure people are voting based on the helpfulness and/or merit of the response. That’s the ideal on Lemmy but it’s obviously not always the case here. Presumably, you’d have to be logged in on the other platform to vote but you can just see the discussion from Lemmy, I guess?

      • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
        2·
        6 months ago

        It seems to matter for the users at Stack Overflow. And why should anybody give anything for free to the crooks in Silicon Valley. All they do is create technology designed to extract value out of people and give as little as possible back.

        • delirious_owl@discuss.online
          1·
          6 months ago

          Because that’s the nature of FOSS. The good news is, if they trained on you data that’s licensed CC BY-SA (as all SO content is), then you can request their source code, and they legally must provide it.

          This is a good thing.

      • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
        3·
        6 months ago

        It’s not about privacy. It’s about AI companies stealing other peoples work and knowledge and profiting. Like what they did with artists. And I think that’s bothering a lot of people. It’s kind of sad that we cannot exchange information with each other for free, without some Silicon Valley crooks taking advantage and trying to convert other people’s good will into profit.

        These LLMs are also polluting the web with AI junk and slop. The web is absolutely tainted with shitty ChatGPT text and images, making it harder and harder to find authentic information. I think a lot of people don’t want to contribute with that.