Viewers are divided over whether the film should have shown Japanese victims of the weapon created by physicist Robert Oppenheimer. Experts say it’s complicated.

  • kayjay@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    His reasoning was if the US didn’t make it, the Nazis would, and that would be even worse. He never wanted to make the bomb, it was just the lesser of two evils.

    • RatherBeMTB
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Making the bomb was a good decision, dropping two over civilians after the war finished was genocide.

      • TopRamenBinLaden
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US was never trying to exterminate the Japanese race and culture, so no it wasn’t genocide. It was a fucked up act of war, maybe you could even call it an atrocity, but calling it a genocide is wrong by definition.