• flambonkscious
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I really fail to see the problem. The open source community has long had a tendency for wacky names.

  • Aradina [She/They]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Its such a shitty backronym. All because someone had watched pulp fiction and decided it was funny.

    Gimp is never going to spread as much as it needs to because of this name. Imagine telling your mother that she should go download “gimp” without feeling embarrassed.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I don’t think the name is why it isn’t used so much. I think it’s because it’s un-intuitive and almost incomparable to non-destructive/parametric professional programs. You can’t even change text after applying a style… for many, things like this makes it practically useless for real work.

      Someone already tried to fork GIMP in order to change the name (Glimpse)… it didn’t work and they gave up.

      • Aradina [She/They]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m not saying its solely the name, I’m saying its the earliest stumbling point for getting people to use it

        • refalo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The only time I have ever heard of anyone complaining about the name were literally the Glimpse devs themselves.